I will add that I'm talking TV's, not projectors that cost 5k+.Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Waiting on all the people who have CRT's and LCD's, DLP's, and Plasmas to chime in on how much better the CRT's are.
Remember, there are no 50-60 inch CRT's. LCD, Plasma, DLP, LCOS, etc, is all you got.
So to me, a CRT is irrelevant.
I've seen a few people who claim they are better, but I don't see anyone trying to build really big CRT's because the technology is better. Do you?
LOL.
So why do my guests enter my theater and go on and on and on about "it doesn't look that good in my theater, WTH did you do and how do I get my theater to look like that!"
oh well. It's generally accepted that CRT owns all. But it's like trying to convince somebody that vinyl is far superior to CD. They just haven't been exposed to audio/vido done correctly.
For the super-high end people, I know that a properly-calibrated CRT projector is still slightly ahead.
But nobody said projectors, and very few people on average have such an expensive setup.
When you're talking 2-3k for a TV, I've yet to see a CRT that looks as good as the current big screen offerings.
