- Feb 4, 2003
- 3,370
- 0
- 71
They are both transfering digital information over your cable line, and fullscreen video must be using a lot of bandwidth. How come watching tv has like no effect on internet bandwidth?
Originally posted by: flexy
well...correct me if i am wrong...but the cable (even the modem itself) has a LOT of headroom left upwards.
Thats why companies like comcast can upgrade a 3MB line to 4MB or 6MB even 8MB/s easily just by "uploading" a config file to your modem..the line and the modem itself stay the same
I dont even know where it tops out with cable bandwidth (someone lese might know)...but it should give you an idea that there is plenty bandwidth left for TV and internet.
Also....dont forget that "fullscreen" video still means its compressed...even hdtv comes in compressed format.
Originally posted by: Sureshot324
They are both transfering digital information over your cable line, and fullscreen video must be using a lot of bandwidth. How come watching tv has like no effect on internet bandwidth?
Originally posted by: Evander
Anyone else disappointed with their digital cable? Changing channels is much much slower, and they have this no-digital copy signal that is picked up by my pvr (I can record, but if I transfer the file to DVDR it says it must erase the hard drive copy). I'm thinking about going back to analog
And another bad thing is that the compression IS noticable, especially when you have red objects on a black background