- Apr 17, 2001
- 3,650
- 0
- 76
In theory if everyone made all their hardware fully compatible and exactly to spec, shouldn't it all work, all the time? It seems that every compatability issue we see has something to do with a manufactuer cutting corners and releasing something that wasn't "fully compliant".
Why do companies continue to do this? I think the general consensus amoung all PC users is that a machine that works 100% of the time is much better than one that works 90% of the time and is 10% faster.
Why do companies continue to do this? I think the general consensus amoung all PC users is that a machine that works 100% of the time is much better than one that works 90% of the time and is 10% faster.
