Consider that... Dr. Tom Woods is probably a speech writer for Dr. Paul (I heard that Dr. Woods probably ghostwrote at least part of Liberty Defined); that Dr. Woods' colleagues have said the Federalists meant that the current law binding America and the world meant whatever the Supreme Court says it does; Dr. Woods favors secession and nullification; that he favors the Confederation over the Federalist Republic; and that he invokes the Constitution to show that govts are lawless.
Dr. Paul is a genius... he knows that the Federalists were not anti-statist in any way other than by the rhetoric of most of them (Washington and Reagan were more similar to each other in that regard than any other President was) and I've given all of the evidence I need to give for the fact that he's not really a Federal Constitutionalist.
All of that said... why do so many people try to tell me he's not an anarcho-confederalist?
Dr. Paul is a genius... he knows that the Federalists were not anti-statist in any way other than by the rhetoric of most of them (Washington and Reagan were more similar to each other in that regard than any other President was) and I've given all of the evidence I need to give for the fact that he's not really a Federal Constitutionalist.
All of that said... why do so many people try to tell me he's not an anarcho-confederalist?