• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

why do people like saying they have a huge foot size?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Ilmater
Originally posted by: moshquerade
ginormous feet look silly.... like clown's feet or somethin. i'm not thinking, "oh he must have a large schlong." i'm thinking, "is the circus in town?"
Click to expand...
HEY! The circus pays well, alright!
Click to expand...
😉

can you get me free tix? 😀

 
Originally posted by: Ilmater
I really don't want to comment, simply because this just isn't a big deal. If anyone in the world hasn't figured out that NOTHING other than seeing a man's manhood will tell you how big it is, they're stupid. Period. End of story.

Proof?

I'm 6'9". I wear size 18 shoes. I also have very big hands, and my fingers are very long: in other words, everything is proportional from the outside. My member is VERY thick, but I'd only call it above average in length (6 1/2 around, 6 1/2 long), which would contrast what was said about feet and fingers (since both are very long).

So, again, those things don't matter, and you're stupid if you haven't figured that out.

As for what Landroval said, it's very true. I've had many women complain about discomfort, and more importantly, it's basically impossible to get decent oral sex. So guys, don't complain about smaller manhoods: I personally would LOVE for mine to be smaller.
Click to expand...

OMGIMEASUREMYCOCKALLDAY!!!!!!11111
 
Originally posted by: mobobuff
?

My dong is much larger than my index finger.
Click to expand...

I'm assuming they mean relative size of the index finger, a trend of longer finger = longer "other" member.

I'm also thinking maybe OP has small feet but long fingers 😛
 
Originally posted by: ribbon13
Maybe a ratio? index finger * 1.33 == wang?
Click to expand...

that would leave me with a 4" cock...its actually about 6-6.5"...i would say index finger*2...or that there isnt really any way to accurately measure, without actually measuring it...hell, people with the whole micropenis thing could be index finger*.66 ...
 
What interests me even more is how "deep" a girl is. I've dated girls of all different hights and there never seems to be a correllation between hight and whether I hit the "bottom" (which I really don't like doing...it is not necessarily comfortable for me...and I imagine it isn't that horrible comfortable for her...although they always say it doesn't hurt). Anyway, I'd like to know if there is some correllation between any part of a girls body and their depth.
 
Originally posted by: omniviper
Why so?

There's no correlation. Because of how people are on the net and their psychology, people who like saying they have big weeners are endowed with weenies. Dick size is dick size. Lets just keep it at that!:beer:



This may be true on the other hand:

From Reuters via Yahoo: "On the heels of a previous report that debunked the notion that a man's shoe size could be used to estimate the length of his penis, a new study now claims that those with inquiring minds need merely take a gander at a man's forefinger. According to Greek scientists, the length of a man's index finger can accurately predict the length of his penis. The findings are published in the September issue of the journal Urology."

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/760065/posts
Click to expand...



i find the people who always go on about the size of their shlong are the ones most reluctant to get it out, they feel the need to make up for something by lying. the people who never say anything about it are usually the well endowed ones.

i think girth is a more useful measurement, u need the right mix of length and width to make her 😀
 
Originally posted by: PricklyPete
What interests me even more is how "deep" a girl is. I've dated girls of all different hights and there never seems to be a correllation between hight and whether I hit the "bottom" (which I really don't like doing...it is not necessarily comfortable for me...and I imagine it isn't that horrible comfortable for her...although they always say it doesn't hurt). Anyway, I'd like to know if there is some correllation between any part of a girls body and their depth.
Click to expand...

:Q
 
What interests me even more is how "deep" a girl is. I've dated girls of all different hights and there never seems to be a correllation between hight and whether I hit the "bottom" (which I really don't like doing...it is not necessarily comfortable for me...and I imagine it isn't that horrible comfortable for her...although they always say it doesn't hurt). Anyway, I'd like to know if there is some correllation between any part of a girls body and their depth.
Click to expand...


Now I don't feel so bad as I've often wondered about that too. I think it may have something to do with the nerves in there, some girls are just more sensitive than others. I've drilled a short girl to the point where I thought internal damage was imminent, yet was being encouraged to uhh, give her more. On the other hand, 2 gf's later the female's height and weight were greater, yet she would shriek and recoil from the even the most gentle of pokings. I remember with her 'Ye Olde Woof-Woof' was always out of the question (booooo hissssss).


Nerves. It's gotta be nerves.
 
Originally posted by: Landroval
Anyone else notice that men's shoes (not women's) have gotten relatively "larger" in size -- i.e. someone who wore a size 10 in the 80s now tends to need a size 11.5 or 12? Obviously, men get off on this. Women, who we assume do not want larger feet, have no such size increase. A similar thing can be seen in T-Shirts and jeans. For example, the Levis 501s of the 70s or 80s are smaller even though they are marked the same size. Also, women's clothes are often marked at a lower size to please those who want to fit into a smaller size -- I have noticed the more expensive brands are more likely to do this.

Bottom line is that men apparently want to feel like they have large feet and see that as "manly" and hope others notice it and think they have a huge cock.

edit: typo
Click to expand...



I disagree - because I have been a size 13 since 1980.
 
Originally posted by: meltdown75
Originally posted by: Ilmater
I really don't want to comment, simply because this just isn't a big deal. If anyone in the world hasn't figured out that NOTHING other than seeing a man's manhood will tell you how big it is, they're stupid. Period. End of story.

Proof?

I'm 6'9". I wear size 18 shoes. I also have very big hands, and my fingers are very long: in other words, everything is proportional from the outside. My member is VERY thick, but I'd only call it above average in length (6 1/2 around, 6 1/2 long), which would contrast what was said about feet and fingers (since both are very long).

So, again, those things don't matter, and you're stupid if you haven't figured that out.

As for what Landroval said, it's very true. I've had many women complain about discomfort, and more importantly, it's basically impossible to get decent oral sex. So guys, don't complain about smaller manhoods: I personally would LOVE for mine to be smaller.
Click to expand...

wow. self pwnage for talking about your wang on teh intraweb 😛
Click to expand...

I disagree, more guys here should talk about their wang 😛

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top