- Sep 18, 2002
- 13,990
- 0
- 0
Exactly right. There is a small chance that a bacterial infection can take place if the virus successfully weakens your immune system.Originally posted by: Ladies Man
so while your immune system is weak another bacteral infections don't invade your system
but i don't like it... it's better to let them run their course then to take med's cus the next generation of infections are stronger
A virus is not effected by antibiotics, they do nothing. Virii have no cures.Originally posted by: Ladies Man
so while your immune system is weak another bacteral infections don't invade your system
but i don't like it... it's better to let them run their course then to take med's cus the next generation of infections are stronger
Sums it up pretty well right there. Also it puts some more money into everybodys pocket except yours if they give you a prescription.Originally posted by: Mark R
Because they aren't sure that it is a virus.
Because most patients expect a prescription instead of 'go to bed, have a hot drink and take a tylenol'.
Because some viral infections pre-dispose to getting a bacterial infection.
Yes, but if your immune system is weak, other bacteria may come and invade your weakened system... that's why we take them SOMETIMES.. but not always.Originally posted by: 911paramedic
A virus is not effected by antibiotics, they do nothing. Virii have no cures.Originally posted by: Ladies Man
so while your immune system is weak another bacteral infections don't invade your system
but i don't like it... it's better to let them run their course then to take med's cus the next generation of infections are stronger
I have asthma that's's been well controlled but when I get upper respiratory infections I often end up with secondary bacterial pnenmoniaOriginally posted by: Jellomancer
Why would they do such a thing? Are they stupid?
The pharmaceutical industry and popular media have created the pill=cure ethos. Only weak-willed and consumer-minded physicians will give medically-unnecessary prescriptions.It's a combination of 2 things.. One is the patient wants to leave with a pill that makes them better, the other is the pharmaceutical companies pay the doctors for prescribing certain medications.
My wife works for a large pharmaceutical company so I know for a fact that there are kick-backs to the doctors, etc.....
The medical/pharmaceutical industry should come up with a placebo "antibiotic" for that purpose. Load it up with vicodin or something so that the patient "feels" like it's working...Originally posted by: FoBoT
to appease hypocondriacs
that is a good idea, except you would probably have to tell the patient, which would sorta mess it upOriginally posted by: Astaroth33
The medical/pharmaceutical industry should come up with a placebo "antibiotic" for that purpose. Load it up with vicodin or something so that the patient "feels" like it's working...Originally posted by: FoBoT
to appease hypocondriacs
What he said...Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
The pharmaceutical industry and popular media have created the pill=cure ethos. Only weak-willed and consumer-minded physicians will give medically-unnecessary prescriptions.It's a combination of 2 things.. One is the patient wants to leave with a pill that makes them better, the other is the pharmaceutical companies pay the doctors for prescribing certain medications.
My wife works for a large pharmaceutical company so I know for a fact that there are kick-backs to the doctors, etc.....
The only doctors being paid to prescribe certain medications are unethical ones. The majority do not practice quid pro quo medicine but it is a significant problem in the discipline.
It is an exception NOT the norm to give patients antibiotics as prophylaxis against latent bacterial infections. People with chronic diseases: cystic fibrosis, sickel cell disease, asthma, HIV/AIDS, etc get special consideration b/c best-evidence demonstrates a clear benefit.
To the contrary the vast majority of upper respiratory infections (sinusitis, rhinitis, pharyngitis) are viral and in otherwise healthy people it is BAD medicine to give antibiotics. Even clear bacterial infections like ear (otitis media) are not treated by the antibiotic neither is strep throat. In both cases antibiotics merely reduce the risk of complications like mastoiditis (which can lead to meningitis) and rheumatic fever from untreated strep.
I assume you meant to be sarcastic? Decent physicians that felt the need to give antibiotics would give their non-insured (or otherwise financially constrained) patients samples sufficient to cover their treatment. It's one of the few areas where pharmaceutical companies and their minions actually serve the public good.Of course, for the millions who don't have any health insurance, they would feel robbed if they left the doctor's office empty handed.