What I'm really asking is, why has it been determined by engine manufacturers that their engines should operate from 180F to 250F? Do the lower power "economy" engines operate at the lower end of the spectrum while the "performance" engines run at the higher end? Is the reason for running hot but not 500F hot is because it's a compromise between performance and not having such things as seals, lubricants, bearings and whatnot failing prematurely with their current design, warranting higher quality/more expensive materials?
Wouldn't it be more efficient to run an engine (I'm talking about otto cycle here) at 100F-150F? Sure you wouldn't get the same kind of performance per se, but it should be consuming far less energy.
Why doesn't engine coolant boil at temperatures such as 250F? Or are there such great variances in what can be considered the engine "temperature" that the coolant may only be 180F, the exhaust manifold is 1200F, the cylinder heads are 800F and the block is 250F?
I'm confused about a lot of things and I've been wondering what is considered the "engine" temperature and why certain things are over 6 times hotter than the very area in which all this heat is being generated in.
Moved to appropriate forum - Moderator Rubycon
Wouldn't it be more efficient to run an engine (I'm talking about otto cycle here) at 100F-150F? Sure you wouldn't get the same kind of performance per se, but it should be consuming far less energy.
Why doesn't engine coolant boil at temperatures such as 250F? Or are there such great variances in what can be considered the engine "temperature" that the coolant may only be 180F, the exhaust manifold is 1200F, the cylinder heads are 800F and the block is 250F?
I'm confused about a lot of things and I've been wondering what is considered the "engine" temperature and why certain things are over 6 times hotter than the very area in which all this heat is being generated in.
Moved to appropriate forum - Moderator Rubycon