- Nov 27, 1999
- 65,357
- 404
- 126
Originally posted by: Zim Hosein
3 more DVDs from netflix and I'll be done w/ season 2!![]()
Originally posted by: tangent1138
sci fi = expensive effects and (relatively speaking) low ratings.
unfortunately reality tv is taking over. it's super cheap to make and they get high ratings. look at that american idol crap.
Originally posted by: tangent1138
sci fi = expensive effects and (relatively speaking) low ratings.
unfortunately reality tv is taking over. it's super cheap to make and they get high ratings. look at that american idol crap.
Originally posted by: Falloutboy
Originally posted by: tangent1138
sci fi = expensive effects and (relatively speaking) low ratings.
unfortunately reality tv is taking over. it's super cheap to make and they get high ratings. look at that american idol crap.
Reality TV must die!!!! its ruining tv.. god I really think we need to move away from network tv and make a show like a subscription just subscribe to the shows you like no ads no crap just get a new show weekly or biweekly deliverd to a video on demand box...say 20 bucks per series per year for high end dramas/scifi, 5-10 bucks for cheaper shows. You would only need a million people ot watch a show based on the average million per episode high end dramas make. I mean look at enterprise it gets about 3million people watching a week, say half of them are fans, thats a 1.5million people. I know what your saying people won't want to pay for watching a show, but they al ready are people pay upwards to 50-100 a mounth for cable and satalight, and honestly how much of it do you really watch? lets say you watch 10 new shows thats 200 bucks a year. add in "rerun" packs for older shows for say 1-2bucks a year. I honestly think this would greatly improve the quality of tv and would allow for more niche tv genres to emerge.
Network tv is free to us because they are being paid by advertisers (commercials). The better the show / the more people who watch, the more the network is financially supported (and they pay the show). Nothing new there. What you're missing in the subscription proposition is marketing. We hear about these shows because there are network campaigns to market them - we see them repeatedly and we may even catch an episode or two and become interested.Originally posted by: Falloutboy
Originally posted by: tangent1138
sci fi = expensive effects and (relatively speaking) low ratings.
unfortunately reality tv is taking over. it's super cheap to make and they get high ratings. look at that american idol crap.
Reality TV must die!!!! its ruining tv.. god I really think we need to move away from network tv and make a show like a subscription just subscribe to the shows you like no ads no crap just get a new show weekly or biweekly deliverd to a video on demand box...say 20 bucks per series per year for high end dramas/scifi, 5-10 bucks for cheaper shows. You would only need a million people ot watch a show based on the average million per episode high end dramas make. I mean look at enterprise it gets about 3million people watching a week, say half of them are fans, thats a 1.5million people. I know what your saying people won't want to pay for watching a show, but they al ready are people pay upwards to 50-100 a mounth for cable and satalight, and honestly how much of it do you really watch? lets say you watch 10 new shows thats 200 bucks a year. add in "rerun" packs for older shows for say 1-2bucks a year. I honestly think this would greatly improve the quality of tv and would allow for more niche tv genres to emerge.
here .. eps 1-22.Originally posted by: dragonballgtz
I never watched Dark Angel. What happened in the first season?
Originally posted by: Zim Hosein
Why did they cancel Dark Angel?(
Just read this on tvtome:Originally posted by: Queasy
because Firefily was better
J/K
Now I have even more reason to despise Firefly.Fox cancelled the show so they could afford to produce what was the highly anticipated sci-fi western Firefly from Buffy creator Joss Whedon. It would have been too costly to produce two futuristic sci-fi shows with expensive sets,speicial effects,etc. Rather than stick with Dark Angel,which was getting mediocre ratings, Fox felt it was worth the risk to axe this show and replace it with Firefly. Of course , in the end , Fox was wrong in making that decision as not only did Dark Angel much better ratings than Firefly but there were problems from day one with Firefly as the pilot was not satisfying enough by Fox standards and had to be reshot.
debuting on a Friday night didn't help Firefly either. I don't think Fox gave either one a chance (DA season 2 or Firefly). I think Fox decides which shows should succeed or not depending on their own liking, not the viewers'.Originally posted by: Queasy
Fox mishandled both badly FWIW...especially Firefly. Little to no advertising, showed episodes out of order, didn't show the original pilot that gives a proper introduction to the characters until after the show was cancelled. Watching the series on DVD, Firefly was definitely underrated (IMHO).
I think Dark Angel got about 10 times the advertising that Firefly did.