Why did old computers used to have a 'turbo' button

eLiu

Diamond Member
Jun 4, 2001
6,407
1
0
Well? I remember playing with this as a kid...

Question inspired by some of the new posts about how games are running too fast on Athlon X2 procs.
 

Elcs

Diamond Member
Apr 27, 2002
6,278
6
81
I thought the Turbo button was to slow down the machine to run older programs that ran too fast on the newer processors at the time.

Before my time on PC's Im afraid. I was an Amiga-holic during that time.
 

Gadzookie

Senior member
Apr 17, 2005
498
0
0
i think the turbo button actually did nothing lol i think it was just a fad there was a time when everything ended in " turbo "
 

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
59,090
9,510
126
It's there to make the cards fall slower when you win solitare. Much more satisfying.
 

FlyingPenguin

Golden Member
Nov 1, 2000
1,793
0
0
Well as an old fart who grew up with this...

The Turbo switch was used to underclock the CPU so that older apps that were CPU timing depended would run properly.

Older games in particular would have this problem, but even old business apps might use (for example) a simple loop counter to create a delay for scrolling text instead of using a clock timer. Use that app on a newer faster computer and the text may scroll to fast to read.

Once computers had more memory, clock based timing loops became the norm and you never see this problem anymore. You rarely saw a turbo switch after the x386 era.
 

YOyoYOhowsDAjello

Moderator<br>A/V & Home Theater<br>Elite member
Aug 6, 2001
31,204
45
91
Originally posted by: FlyingPenguin
Well as an old fart who grew up with this...

The Turbo switch was used to underclock the CPU so that older apps that were CPU timing depended would run properly.

Older games in particular would have this problem, but even old business apps might use (for example) a simple loop counter to create a delay for scrolling text instead of using a clock timer. Use that app on a newer faster computer and the text may scroll to fast to read.

Once computers had more memory, clock based timing loops became the norm and you never see this problem anymore. You rarely saw a turbo switch after the x386 era.

My turbo buttom made things run faster though... :confused:

mdchesne's explanation seems to match what was happening with my computer back then.
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
stuck around for a while in cases because a turbo button looked neat. 99% of the time it wasn't even hooked up;) but the light would come on if u did toggle it on anyways. at cases with turbo stuck around for quite a long while.
 

JBird7986

Senior member
May 17, 2005
230
0
76
I remember having the first family computer we owned armed with a turbo button. The little LCD readout read 99 when it was unpressed and 00 when it was pressed.

Specs (1994) :
100MHz Intel Pentium
16MB RAM
1.2GB HDD (C: )
4x TEAC CD-ROM (D: )
5.25" Floppy (B: )
3.5" Floppy (A: )

At the time, this was a computer powerful enough to "run a small country." The HDD was also the first to break the 1GB barrier.
 

GTaudiophile

Lifer
Oct 24, 2000
29,767
33
81
Ah, brings back memories of my first PC (after having used Macs for 12 years).

Intel Pentium PRO 200Mhz
128MB SDRAM
4.0GB Harddrive
12x Mitsumi CD-ROM
1.44 Floppy
4MB S3 Virge videocard with 4MB VRAM
SoundBlaster AWE64 soundcard

Circa. 1996
 

Rubycon

Madame President
Aug 10, 2005
17,768
485
126
No it did not o/c the cpu...

When turbo was engaged (default) the cpu ran at full (default) speed.

When the button was disengaged, the cpu ran at a fraction of its speed.

With the advent of the i486, it was quite popular as many programs (particularly games) ran completely dependant on cpu clock. If you were using one of these programs and found the action unacceptably fast, slowing a i486 DX/33 down to 8MHz made things more tolerable.

Sierra games come to mind. :)
 

Ohji

Member
Dec 24, 2004
26
0
0
Wow. This thread brings back memories. Those old Sierra games (which I LOVED and sorely miss) often had sequences that were completely impossible if your computer was too fast. In one game (one of the QFG series, I think), you had to dodge arrows being shot at you from all sides as you traveled across the screen, and you had no chance if the CPU speed was too fast.

Despite the crappy graphics and MIDI sound, those were some of the best games I've ever played. Too bad the adventure genre has pretty much died...
 

theMan

Diamond Member
Mar 17, 2005
4,386
0
0
yeah, i remember playing games, and when you pressed the turbo button, the game would speed up a ton.
 

Maluno

Senior member
Mar 28, 2005
697
0
0
What years was this in? I don't remember a thing, but most likely cause I am too young... :(
 

JimPhelpsMI

Golden Member
Oct 8, 2004
1,261
0
0
Hi, Inexperienced BASIC programers wrote most of the games in the beginning. They used program loops for timers because they didn't know the correct way of using the Real Time Clock pulses. The only way to play some of this stuff on newer faster machines was to slow down the processor so that the game ran more like the correct speed. Just one of the possibilities. Jim
 

ixelion

Senior member
Feb 5, 2005
984
1
0
You rarely saw a turbo switch after the x386 era.

Yeah, my first computer, a 386, also had a turbo button it was yellow with a little red LED display, when you pressed it it did nothing, at least i didnt notice i was only 9 though lol.

Case manufacturers should but it back, and make it so that when you press it, your FSB goes up 5% or something :p
 

sharkeeper

Lifer
Jan 13, 2001
10,886
2
0
Case manufacturers should but it back, and make it so that when you press it, your FSB goes up 5% or something

In today's age it would be a toggle between quiet and full speed for 20 fans or so. <ricerspeak>if it sounds faster, it most likely is faster</ricerspeak>
 

DaveSimmons

Elite Member
Aug 12, 2001
40,730
670
126
Originally posted by: YOyoYOhowsDAjello
Originally posted by: FlyingPenguin
Well as an old fart who grew up with this...

The Turbo switch was used to underclock the CPU so that older apps that were CPU timing depended would run properly.

Older games in particular would have this problem, but even old business apps might use (for example) a simple loop counter to create a delay for scrolling text instead of using a clock timer. Use that app on a newer faster computer and the text may scroll to fast to read.

Once computers had more memory, clock based timing loops became the norm and you never see this problem anymore. You rarely saw a turbo switch after the x386 era.

My turbo buttom made things run faster though... :confused:

mdchesne's explanation seems to match what was happening with my computer back then.
It's true that enaged = normal speed, dis = underclocked, but the reason why is as FlyingPenguin said, program timing, not for quiet or cooling.

 

Zepper

Elite Member
May 1, 2001
18,998
0
0
Yeah, if the mobo was set up correctly, it should switch between 8 MHz and whatever the standard clock speed was 16/20/25/33 MHz. The diff between 25 and 33 wouldn't make much diff on those clock-dependant programs. A lot of system integrators just didn't want to mess with setting up those LCD displays properly so they would show what was actually happening. It was a forest of jumpers on a little card. And as someone mentioned above, many were never hooked to the mobo at all, but still changed the LED numbers when you pressed the button - quite sleazy.

.bh.
 

morkus64

Diamond Member
Nov 7, 2004
3,302
1
81
Wow, I feel old, even though I'm probably younger than all of you... My first computer was an old WANG with 8" floppy disks (a handmedown from my dad), then eventually he handed down a 286, then 386, then a 486... I remember playing on his old Pentium when he wasn't around and thinking how amaznig it was. I remember the 486 and the 386 having turbo buttons, but neither were connected to anything.

Man, i want that to be in the early 90's again... nothing like a good text adventure, followed by a bit of Commander Keen and checking my email on capaccess (it even had a little section to find an email penpal!)
 

CrispyFried

Golden Member
May 3, 2005
1,122
0
0
heh I remember programming the display to read out 80 instead of 66 when turbo was on. cheap bling, like adding a performance sticker on a junker car.. made it look like it was a screamer lol
 

PrayForDeath

Diamond Member
Apr 12, 2004
3,478
1
76
Ohh, good old days. I remember playing Aladin on an old PC and having to use the turbo button to slow down the CPU in order to make it playable. And I used to love the Quest for Glory series; ahh, memories...
 

wchou

Banned
Dec 1, 2004
1,137
0
0
Originally posted by: Maluno
What years was this in? I don't remember a thing, but most likely cause I am too young... :(

88-92? bush 1 and the desert storm in iraq... an unnecessary war that has lead to instability in the middle east today... this is not fate rather it was artificially created to bring us all to world war 3.