If I had to take a guess I would bet oems are buying every 450 they can make.
Yeah maybe. But AMD has a higher profit margin selling them to us.
But the sale to the OEM has a longer tail, and long-running OEM contracts are a much more secure source of revenue.
Just checked here (Denmark). I seems to be available on the Asus E45M1-pro. Several well-reputed vendors claims to have it in stock.
Plus if AMD tell dell "sorry we can't make them quick enough for you, we know you ordered 10000 units but we can only send 5000" then dell see every hardware vendor has them in stock it would kind of piss dell off which is something you really don't want to do as a chip manufacturer.
People assume that if you are building your own pc with a manufacturers components should get you kudos from that manufacturer for being a loyal customer but in reality you are absolute bottom of the food chain because even with inflated prices modders won't even account for 1% of total profit (infact most of the difference in price between what you pay per unit and what dell pays per unit is taken up by profit for the third party that sold you the chip).
Yes exactly that one. They're being sold here - for what it's worth.Or this thing... and HOLY GIANT HEAT SINK!
http://www.asus.com/Motherboards/AMD_CPU_on_Board/E45M1I_DELUXE/
But my point is, these things were announced and apparently released several months ago. But as far as I've seen they've never actually been sold anywhere.
Or this thing... and HOLY GIANT HEAT SINK!
http://www.asus.com/Motherboards/AMD_CPU_on_Board/E45M1I_DELUXE/
But my point is, these things were announced and apparently released several months ago. But as far as I've seen they've never actually been sold anywhere.
Plus if AMD tell dell "sorry we can't make them quick enough for you, we know you ordered 10000 units but we can only send 5000" then dell see every hardware vendor has them in stock it would kind of piss dell off which is something you really don't want to do as a chip manufacturer.
Maybe the E-350 didn't sell well enough in NA and the mobo manufacturers are waiting for the channel to clear up? IDK what's going on, but really, there's hardly any difference. I haven't checked my two E-350 boards, but do any of them support overclocking? The differences, AFAIK, are:
60MHz higher CPU clock
100MHz higher GPU clock
DDR3-1333 support instead of just 1066
AFAIK the CPU performance was a bigger limitation than GPU or RAM in most things (games, HD Netflix).
this was a rumor started by BSN.. they have little evidence to support this howeverMy current understanding of the 28nm refresh (someone correct me if I'm wrong) is that it didn't make sense, given TSMC's increased 28nm pricing, so AMD is sticking to refreshing Bobcat @ 40nm, until they roll out with updated arch on 28nm sometime in the future (who knows when).
I've also heard rumors that Bobcat's engineering team all jumped ship to Samsung, but I have no idea how true that is. I'm hoping it isn't...
Maybe the E-350 didn't sell well enough in NA and the mobo manufacturers are waiting for the channel to clear up? IDK what's going on, but really, there's hardly any difference. I haven't checked my two E-350 boards, but do any of them support overclocking? The differences, AFAIK, are:
60MHz higher CPU clock
100MHz higher GPU clock
DDR3-1333 support instead of just 1066
AFAIK the CPU performance was a bigger limitation than GPU or RAM in most things (games, HD Netflix).
If all this were true, how come we were sold Llanos when there was a shortage from day one? There was a shortage of E-350s for a while and we've been able to buy them from the start as well.
That's because E-350 mini-itx boards were always too expensive, and they still are. It should cost no more than $65 for an E-350 mini-itx board combo. If they were $65 they would not have been available.
I don't think the pricing was or is the problem, as they are priced right where they should be.
