is there really a scenario in which Mitt doesn't win the nomination, short of some heretofore unknown scandal breaking? the last math I read indicated that Santorum would have to win all the remaining contests with +65% of the vote.
this WaPo op-ed kinda summed up my thoughts.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...nner/2012/03/09/gIQAyxqO1R_story.html?hpid=z2
I don't remember any of this talk about McCain failing to connect with voters when he was losing Southern states to Huckabee and Western states to Romney in 2012
is the GOP nomination actually in flux, or is this purely a conflict of the punditocracy's creation?
this WaPo op-ed kinda summed up my thoughts.
He won six of 10 states, including Ohio, the night’s marquee contest. His win rate was higher than John McCain’s in 2008 on a night that all but clinched the GOP nomination. He has won about 40 percent of the delegates he needs to win the nomination and has more than twice as many as Santorum, his nearest competitor. And the party’s new system requiring the proportional awarding of delegates, though it has slowed Romney’s coronation, now makes it essentially impossible for anybody to catch him.
The fact that Romney is still viewed to be in danger of losing the nomination says less about him than it does about the media. We have turned him into Candidate Sisyphus, providing him with a plentiful supply of boulders to push uphill. First it was make-or-break New Hampshire, then must-win Florida, then do-or-die Michigan and game-changing Ohio. Each time Romney prevails, we assign him a new test.
Only in American politics is a win not a win — a phenomenon that is puzzling the rest of the world. “Mitt Romney wins six on Super Tuesday but gets labeled a loser,” observed Britain’s Daily Mail. Discussing the phenomenon over lunch on Thursday, Gregor Schmitz of Germany’s Der Spiegel news magazine told me that the U.S. media’s propping up of Romney’s opponents is “intellectually insulting” to viewers and readers.
He’s right. On Intrade, the online market where people put money behind their opinions, Romney as of Friday night was given an 86 percent chance of winning the nomination; Santorum, in second place, had a 3.2 percent likelihood.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...nner/2012/03/09/gIQAyxqO1R_story.html?hpid=z2
I don't remember any of this talk about McCain failing to connect with voters when he was losing Southern states to Huckabee and Western states to Romney in 2012
is the GOP nomination actually in flux, or is this purely a conflict of the punditocracy's creation?
Last edited:
