- May 19, 2003
- 23,332
- 249
- 106
Inspired by this pic.
We see it all the time. Some woman goes out, parties her brains out, picks up a guy, sleeps with him and regrets it in the morning. Upset at her decision she decides to call 911 and gives them a sob story about being raped.
You know what comes next. The guy is arrested, his name planted across TV networks, posted all over the Internet and he is treated like he's a serial killer.
All the time, the accuser is allowed to go home, and play the "victim." What makes it worse is once the rape cry is done, they know they have to keep up the act because if they tell the truth, they might face (what very little) consequence there may be.
All the time, no one is allowed to look into the accuser's past. You can't see if she's done this before, or allowed to do check her past experiences. She is effectively immune to scrutiny. The man she has accused has no chance of redemption.
Now, I am not saying every instance of rape is faked, but I'd bet the vast majority of cases, the women are just feeling regret because they couldn't handle their emotions at the time.
It's bullshit. At the very least, men should be allowed the same anonymity until he is actually proven guilty. Without anonymity himself, even if he was found innocent, the damage is done. He will be labelled a rapist for life.
What does ATOT think? Should women not be anonymous, or should men be allowed to remain anonymous until proven guilty?
Touchy, sensitive subject, trolled by a troll. Nothing good can follow from this OP. I'm going to spray this immediate area with troll be gone.
Perknose
Forum Director

We see it all the time. Some woman goes out, parties her brains out, picks up a guy, sleeps with him and regrets it in the morning. Upset at her decision she decides to call 911 and gives them a sob story about being raped.
You know what comes next. The guy is arrested, his name planted across TV networks, posted all over the Internet and he is treated like he's a serial killer.
All the time, the accuser is allowed to go home, and play the "victim." What makes it worse is once the rape cry is done, they know they have to keep up the act because if they tell the truth, they might face (what very little) consequence there may be.
All the time, no one is allowed to look into the accuser's past. You can't see if she's done this before, or allowed to do check her past experiences. She is effectively immune to scrutiny. The man she has accused has no chance of redemption.
Now, I am not saying every instance of rape is faked, but I'd bet the vast majority of cases, the women are just feeling regret because they couldn't handle their emotions at the time.
It's bullshit. At the very least, men should be allowed the same anonymity until he is actually proven guilty. Without anonymity himself, even if he was found innocent, the damage is done. He will be labelled a rapist for life.
What does ATOT think? Should women not be anonymous, or should men be allowed to remain anonymous until proven guilty?
Touchy, sensitive subject, trolled by a troll. Nothing good can follow from this OP. I'm going to spray this immediate area with troll be gone.
Perknose
Forum Director
Last edited by a moderator: