• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Why are PocketPC devices only 240x320?

Not really, there is a PPC with 640x480 and 320x480 is not standard for Palms:

Toshiba e805 PPC is 640x480, others are 320x240

Tungsten T3 is 320x480, others are 320x320, zire and older Palms are 160x160
 
Originally posted by: WinkOsmosis
Palm PDAs are 320x480, and they have less processing power, less memory. WHY?

you are talking about apple and orange in here. why apple is red and orange is orange? they are both fruit. 🙂
Palm runs on Palm OS and PPC runs on another OS.
320x480 is all you need, it seems to be standard since it introduced by sony long time ago(about a year, I guess). now all the palms seems to come out in 320x480 resolution.

for palm programs, it doesn't require much processing power and their program is much smaller in size.
 
Blame Micro$oft.
When the PPC first came out, palms were still at 160x160, so MS required all PPC manufacturers to use a 320x240 screen (as a selling point, so people would buy PPCs instead of palms). Unfortunately, they haven't kept up with the times, and the Pocket PC OS still officially only supports 320x240. Toshiba uses some hacks, er, proprietary software, to get around the 320x240 limit - unfortunately, it means some programs won't work correctly with the higher resolution.
 
It's not about processing power. While not being the main reason, I'm sure battery life is considered when choosing a native resolution for a PDA's LCD. That, coupled with the generally brigher Pocket PC backlighting, was probably a factor in choosing the lower res.
 
Back
Top