Why are most KVMs still VGA/PS2?

Red Squirrel

No Lifer
May 24, 2003
70,565
13,802
126
www.anyf.ca
Looking for a KVM switch, and it's frustrating that most of them still seem to be PS2 and VGA. The ones with DVI and USB are considered premium and are 5x the price! WTF? It's not 2002 anymore. Why is it taking so long for them to adopt DVI and USB?

Just need a basic 2 port too, nothing fancy. All 100 bucks and up.
 

Cerb

Elite Member
Aug 26, 2000
17,484
33
86
Plenty of cheap ones have USB. But, DVI, HDMI, etc., I share your frustration with.

I wonder if the market for KVMs just isn't what it once was, not allowing for sufficient integration and cheapness.
 

thecoolnessrune

Diamond Member
Jun 8, 2005
9,673
583
126
As with almost anything enterprise, It's slow to change. We have several clients with tons of gear in our Datacenters that only can connect by PS/2, and by far the majority of their equipment only takes VGA. Most of the chipsets that do this have long been developed and are extremely cheap to manufacture. Like anything Enterprise, you pay for the privilege of it being made anytime this century.

With the whole economies of scale thing out of the way, there's other reasons too. VGA, for the largest part, is a unidirectional system. In VGA, aside from EDID, the VGA source just shoots the signal down the cable and hopes it gets there alright. DVI on the other hand is a bi-directional protocol. There must be a source, and sync, and they must be able to talk to each other. This is complicated by the fact that the KVM must act as a proxy server between the two DVI connections, acting as a sync and source target for each side of the connection. USB is the same way (though far simpler) in the fact that there has to be a USB host, and a USB device, and they communicate bi-directionally. PS/2's signal is bi-directional, but it's easily emulated as the only communication is clock start / stop controlled by pulling the clock signal low on the host. Once started, the KVM manages that session, and it's unidirectional.

And that's before you even get into DVI and USB's higher bandwidth compared to VGA / PS2.
 

Red Squirrel

No Lifer
May 24, 2003
70,565
13,802
126
www.anyf.ca

That's what I'm using now for multi monitor as linux can't do 3, but I want to build a Windows machine so I don't have to keep dual booting to game and I'll use the KVM to switch between. Also wanting to get rid of the synergy setup as it requires having a secondary machine just to drive the other monitors, but that's another project unrelated to this one.

Not looking for anything enterprise either, just a basic desktop one.

I did manage to find a few in the lower $100 range though. Still a kick in the face when VGA ones are like 20 bucks.