Why are modern videocards so power hungry?

Discussion in 'Video Cards and Graphics' started by Throckmorton, Nov 4, 2010.

  1. Throckmorton

    Throckmorton Lifer

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2007
    Messages:
    16,833
    Likes Received:
    0
    It's been a couple years since I've bought a videocard so I've been researching for the past week. I'm shocked and apalled at how power hungry they are now.

    Remember when video cards were powered by the AGP bus? Then at some point, a few cards started sprouting Molex connectors. Then came the 6 pin connectors on the PCIE cards. Fine, I can see the need to pump more power than the motherboard can supply.

    But now high end videocards have two power connectors and draw 250W+, and it's been getting worse with each of the recent generations, and apparently that will continue.

    Meanwhile, CPUs have become more efficient, hard drives are gradually transitioning to solid state, cars are more efficient even while putting out 2x the horsepower than a decade ago, diesel trucks are cleaner than ever. So why are video cards the exception? Why is an 850W powersupply now the norm for running a single videocard? Will it not end until PSUs aren't capable of keeping up?

    Is there some physical reason that videocards can't become more powerful without requiring more and more power, or is it just a cost tradeoff?
     
    #1 Throckmorton, Nov 4, 2010
    Last edited: Nov 4, 2010
  2. Loading...

    Similar Threads - modern videocards power Forum Date
    [Hardware Unboxed] Is the GTX 970 still worth it for modern games? Video Cards and Graphics Mar 3, 2017
    Fastest modern video card for Celeron G1610 Video Cards and Graphics Jan 26, 2017
    Modern, but ultra-low-end GPU. For mostly video watching. Does it exist? Video Cards and Graphics Jan 19, 2017
    Supersampling in modern laptop? Video Cards and Graphics Jan 9, 2017
    Best videocard for around $300? Video Cards and Graphics Nov 19, 2016

  3. TemjinGold

    TemjinGold Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2006
    Messages:
    3,031
    Likes Received:
    64
    Nope. Just look at AMD's current cards.
     
  4. IntelUser2000

    IntelUser2000 Elite Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2003
    Messages:
    4,232
    Likes Received:
    73
    That's because both ATI and Nvidia went with claims of "Moore's Law cubed" saying they double performance every 6 months while in reality they were making ever bigger and power hogging chips to achieve that. While the performance gains were impressive, power costs came with it.

    Plus, Moore's Law is about doubling transistors and the GPU performance doubling went down to 2x/year, obviously limited by power.
     
  5. fffblackmage

    fffblackmage Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,548
    Likes Received:
    0
    I would say the new 68xx are less power hungry than the 58xx, but the 69xx are probably going to end up using more power anyways.

    A 850W PSU seems more normal for an SLI setup than anything else. A 500-650W PSU is sufficient for most single GPU setups.
     
  6. GaiaHunter

    GaiaHunter Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2008
    Messages:
    3,494
    Likes Received:
    14
    Videocards performance have increased much more than CPU performance in the last few years.

    Still look at 5870 performance/watt compared to 4870x2 and GTX295, or 5850 performance/watt vs 4870/GTX285, etc.
     
  7. Arkadrel

    Arkadrel Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2010
    Messages:
    3,683
    Likes Received:
    0
    Nvidia 480 has a TPD of 250 or something, but thats with avg. load.... if you stress it out completly it ll go up to about ~320 watts. AMD cards use abit less... the TPD they show is from the max they can get the card to use (measured at the wall), and they usually have lower rateings than the nvidia counter parts.

    So when you look at TPD be aware that nvidia arnt measureing most possible draw, but avg load(s), while amd show the most possible they can get out of a card. Why do nvidia do it differntly? because currently theyre cards use more power/performance, and dont want to look bad.

    There are youtube videos of a guy with 4x SLI 480s, and a watt o metter, where he has a PSU that only gives power to the grafics cards. He gets over 1600 watts used. 1600watts / 4 cards = 400watts pr card.

    That means a current 480, if overvolted to overclock can reach over 400watts used.


    Why does newer gfx cards draw more power? because apperntly they cant figour out a way to get big improvements without more energy used. Neither nvidia OR amd can make huge improvements in performance without useing more.

    Anyways if power is expensive where you are, and want a card that doesnt use as much, your better off with a amd product.
     
    #6 Arkadrel, Nov 4, 2010
    Last edited: Nov 4, 2010
  8. tyl998

    tyl998 Senior member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2010
    Messages:
    236
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have a 750 antec power supply. Supplies my 460 SLI rig just fine. With one card even 550 will be fine.
     
  9. Idontcare

    Idontcare Elite Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 1999
    Messages:
    21,130
    Likes Received:
    6
    I suspect it may have already been addressed, but I need to pad my post-count so I'll chime in with the following:

    They are, and you can.

    You could dial the clockspeed down on any GPU to the point that its power-consumption was low enough that it could be fed solely by the mobo, and even at those paltry clocks the card would still outperform any prior generation video card when benched with its clocks dialed down to fit inside the same power-footprint.

    What changed was the fact that people were willing to buy >400W PSU's and deal with >75W dissipation from their video cards. Where there is a market their will be capitalism.

    So we've had performance in video cards grow at a rate faster than what might have been had the video cards been TDP limited like CPU's. (where the max power is on the order of 140W for retail cooling solutions)

    But even CPU's can reach >300W power dissipation if you are willing to spend $ on the 3rd party cooling solution.
     
  10. Throckmorton

    Throckmorton Lifer

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2007
    Messages:
    16,833
    Likes Received:
    0
    Good points about videocards becoming more powerful much faster than CPUs.

    How big is the power usage difference between AMD and nVidia? How do midrange cards like the 6850 and GT460 compare? (those are equivalent right?)
     
  11. blastingcap

    blastingcap Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2010
    Messages:
    6,656
    Likes Received:
    5
    ram eats energy too, and gddr5 at high volts/clocks even more so. ram size/speed has shot up over the years
     
  12. KingstonU

    KingstonU Golden Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2006
    Messages:
    1,388
    Likes Received:
    10
    That is a good point, how does GDDR5 compare to DDR3 in terms of power usage and performance? Are they even comparable?
     
  13. nenforcer

    nenforcer Golden Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2008
    Messages:
    1,762
    Likes Received:
    0
    Its called 3 billion transistors needed to accelerate my virtual girlfriend

    [​IMG]
     
  14. Vdubchaos

    Vdubchaos Lifer

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2009
    Messages:
    10,418
    Likes Received:
    3
    it's also worth noting that even though Video cards use A LOT more power......video games graphics quality in general hasn't really took a BIG leap AT ALL.
     
  15. Throckmorton

    Throckmorton Lifer

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2007
    Messages:
    16,833
    Likes Received:
    0
    That's one thing I've noticed for the past 2-5 years. I go back and play old games like Far Cry and they look amazing because of the artistic quality. Newer games have more effects, but they don't really LOOK better. Even technically, the effects these new cards are driving don't seem that impressive.

    Another thing is when you turn the options down so new games can run on older hardware, they look much worse than the old games did.
     
  16. Throckmorton

    Throckmorton Lifer

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2007
    Messages:
    16,833
    Likes Received:
    0
    I remember when the Luclin expansion came out for Everquest in 2001. It was a huge leap forward in graphics quality. I think I upgraded my video card to a TNT 2 (or maybe GF2?) so I could run it.

    Well early this year I fired up Everquest for old time's sake. It still looks great. The graphics quality and the artistic quality are BETTER than World of Warcraft.
     
  17. nenforcer

    nenforcer Golden Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2008
    Messages:
    1,762
    Likes Received:
    0
    and this bitch too

    [​IMG]
     
  18. Zap

    Zap Elite Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 1999
    Messages:
    22,378
    Likes Received:
    1
    You can ask the same thing about CPUs. My first system didn't even need a heatsink on the CPU. Then, we went with tiny heatsinks/fans. Now even Intel has a tower heatpipe monstrosity in the lineup.

    That's because companies are throwing tech at it instead of throwing better artists at it. Also, some games (BFBC2?) just don't lend themselves to looking good. After all, how good can dirt and camouflage look?
     
  19. Gloomy

    Gloomy Golden Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2010
    Messages:
    1,462
    Likes Received:
    0
    I thought the greenery and water in the game looked pretty great. That being said, Battlefield imo has always had better sound than graphics.
     
  20. dualsmp

    dualsmp Golden Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2003
    Messages:
    1,594
    Likes Received:
    2
    The 6850 is the most powerful card using a single six pin PCI-E connector.
     
  21. blastingcap

    blastingcap Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2010
    Messages:
    6,656
    Likes Received:
    5
    I've often wondered by companies don't simply outsource texture-making or something. Why do X companies need to make X number of dirt textures? Why hasn't a middleware company emerged that specializes in making scalable textures (from crap to photorealistic)? Companies could further mod textures too, like how Valve modded Havok physics, so that we don't see literally the same textures in each game. Maybe if companies didn't have to spend a fortune each on graphics and licensed it from the middleware company, they would have more money left over to spend on trivial things like, I dunno, making the game fun?
     
  22. aka1nas

    aka1nas Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2001
    Messages:
    4,335
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU architectures went parallel earlier and to a much greater degree than CPU architectures did, and are hitting the "multi-core scaling wall" earlier as a result. It's not like were going to get 16-core desktop CPUs anytime soon, either.
     
  23. Arkadrel

    Arkadrel Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2010
    Messages:
    3,683
    Likes Received:
    0

    I have a picture with a table showing the watts, measured off the wall, where they calculated out the system use (they ran furmark and measured at the wall). I cant for the life of me remember where the hell I got it.



    **Edit: (goes off to look for more charts for the rest)

    [​IMG]



    Source: http://www.techpowerup.com/ (just search for a card, go to review under "power comsumption")

    max load: (measured at the wall, all cards at stock gpu core/mem/shaders ect)

    480 = 320w
    470 = 232w
    460 = 155w

    5870 = 212w
    6870 = 163w
    6850 = 125w (from same site but differnt table)


    These are all from 1 site, instead of what I had written down myself from various places so probably give a better representation than those I posted at first. For some reason they can vary abit from site to site.
     
    #22 Arkadrel, Nov 4, 2010
    Last edited: Nov 4, 2010
  24. blastingcap

    blastingcap Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2010
    Messages:
    6,656
    Likes Received:
    5
    Those are from TechPowerUp and seem to list TDPs not actual power draws. TDP doesn't necessarily equal power draw.
     
  25. tvdang7

    tvdang7 Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2005
    Messages:
    2,222
    Likes Received:
    0
    only the super high end like 480gtx and 5970. The high end tends to stay about the same as the generation before it.