- Jan 1, 2001
- 247
- 0
- 0
This is my first time posting on the Hihgly Technical forum, so if I'm in the wrong spot, sorry about that.
Now, I've always thought that LCDs are 24-bit, but in the last month or two I've found out otherwise. From browsing the Dell Inspiron forums I've found out that color LCD displays used in laptops are not really 24-bit, but 18-bit. You can find one such posting at "http://delltalk.us.dell.com/messages/message_view.asp?name=insp_video&id=zwpmw". I've looked this up in some other sources, and this is true - for laptops, but not their desktop variant. From experience I know that Photoshop editing is much easier on my CRT monitor and it seems to be a pain on my laptop, especially noticeable when you're down to editing single pixels. I've looked up how LCDs work at "http://www.howstuffworks.com/lcd.htm" and I just don't see why 24-bit LCDs on laptops are not possible. If most LCDs can work with 256 level of brightness per pixel, doesn't that add up to 16,777,216 for seperate RGB components? Is cost a factor? That doesn't make much sense for me either, since desktop LCDs cost less. I can't see why form factor matters either; they seem to be made in the same way with similar... for that fact why are desktop LCDs fatter?
Now, I've always thought that LCDs are 24-bit, but in the last month or two I've found out otherwise. From browsing the Dell Inspiron forums I've found out that color LCD displays used in laptops are not really 24-bit, but 18-bit. You can find one such posting at "http://delltalk.us.dell.com/messages/message_view.asp?name=insp_video&id=zwpmw". I've looked this up in some other sources, and this is true - for laptops, but not their desktop variant. From experience I know that Photoshop editing is much easier on my CRT monitor and it seems to be a pain on my laptop, especially noticeable when you're down to editing single pixels. I've looked up how LCDs work at "http://www.howstuffworks.com/lcd.htm" and I just don't see why 24-bit LCDs on laptops are not possible. If most LCDs can work with 256 level of brightness per pixel, doesn't that add up to 16,777,216 for seperate RGB components? Is cost a factor? That doesn't make much sense for me either, since desktop LCDs cost less. I can't see why form factor matters either; they seem to be made in the same way with similar... for that fact why are desktop LCDs fatter?
