So I miss having a convertible, but all of the ones I'd want are RWD which would suck for a couple of months out of the year here in VA. I have always kind of liked Wranglers for their rugged look, and the idea of being able to have an open top combined with 4WD is appealing since I could enjoy the benefits during both the summer and winter months. I did a search on AutoTrader for Wranglers 2006-2010, manual transmission, under 45k miles, etc. Prices start at around $15k all the way up to $30k, with MANY of them being $22k+. This surprises me, because there just doesn't seem to be much "to" a Wrangler. No way am I going to pay that much for a small vehicle with cloth seats and a cheap-looking interior/dash. For that amount of money, I'd just get a preowned TL or IS 250 AWD and feel like that payment was going towards something nice. So what makes them so expensive (for what they are)?
People forget they are made by Chrysler. If they could that into consideration, they would cost less.
they are a true offroad vehicle with a frame not some wanna be unibody POS they hold their resale superbly thru 06 they came with the legendary 4.0 inline 6 which is known to just..last. they are one of the most accesorized vehicle on the planet i LOVE my wrangler, its not my dd..but id get rid of my dd before it its rare that u have affection for a car, with me anyways..i truley love my YJ like i have no other vehicle
You doesn't afraid of anything. Probably because they have a strong following and are solid so people will buy them anyways.
They are pricey as hell and their quality does seem a bit dicey not to mention sh*t ride from what I hear and horrendous on gas, plus apparently the door hinges always, always rust out. This is just what I learned researching them a year back. I love the look of the Rubicon and a jeep would be a cool vehicle to own.
they arent for everyone my 1992 sahara is built like a tank and in awesome shape but its bone stock and not beasted its a manual ive had it 2 years,aside from cosmetic ive put an exhuast on, a couple bulbs and a battery (and reg tuneup stuff) the newer ones are nice..just gotta do due dilligence like anything else.
The wrangler is one of the very few vehicles made by Chrysler that's worth a darn. For the money it's the best out of the box offoader out there. They hold their value because they're in high demand. They're in high demand for the exact reasons you want one. If you're financing you may want to consider just buying new, you might be able to get a better deal on financing.
The 2008 we have at work had been in the shop four times in the first year. They are great vehicles, very capable, when they are running.
There is more to a Jeep than the interior materials. In fact, for a Wrangler - most buyers have NO interest in expensive materials and fancy options in the interior. Why? Because Wranglers, above all other Jeeps but certainly not exclusive, are vehicles made to be abused. If you aren't going to do anything with your vehicle other than drive it on pavement, don't get a Wrangler. They are the among the most versatile, useful, and capable vehicles out there, but are not exactly designed for apparently what you want. The fact that you are comparing an open-top Wrangler to a convertible coupe is extremely comical. Also, this is laughable. Jeep has always produced some of the most dependable vehicle platforms out there. It is owned by Chrysler, but most of their vehicles do not share platforms with any other badge. The ones that do are the ones with laughable suspension systems, made for the "SUVs are great for stuffing full with random shit and/or people" type. I may be a little biased since the Wrangler is built in my hometown, and love the history of the platform. But they are amazing vehicles. Anyhow - Chrysler is not the company most think of these days. The new ownership is completely turning the company around, though they started that on their own a few years back. I'd buy a vehicle with a lifetime powertrain warranty. If it wasn't nearly 40k, the 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be at the top of my list. Always was a terrific vehicle, extremely capable like the Wrangler, but it's a lot more of a "complete" vehicle. But the new ownership, Pentastar engine, and redesign look amazing.
It's a good design, but you are right in that they are sorely overpriced. Antiquated engine, poor fuel economy, etc
The ride on the TJ and JK wranglers (JK is the newest generation, TJ is the one before the JK) is significantly better than the previous generations. That being said, if you're expecting it to ride like your average car or SUV you're not going to be happy. It's got front and rear solid axles and suspension designed to survive abuse. What it comes down to is if you want it to drive like a car you're not going to be happy. If you want a fun vehicle that can do what a jeep does and can accept all the other things that go along with it you're going to think its great. Almost every jeep owner I've met absolutely loves their jeeps. The only ones I've met that didn't enjoy them were because they hated how it was different from a car or normal road oriented SUV.
Yeah, I know they are a true off-road vehicle with a frame and you're right, the 4.0 has the reputation for being a workhorse, extremely reliable engine...just like the Nissan 3.5 VQ 6 cylinder and of course the Ford 5.0L 302ci. Like Skoorb said, the 4.0 is a gas-guzzler but I guess most people buying these vehicles don't care or are willing to deal with that considering the purpose of the vehicle. Didn't know about the door hinges, though. Of course I'd want to ride with the doors off, but not all the time. :\ I know you probably pay a premium for the Jeep name and of course anything 4x4 is going to be inherently more expensive, but it blows my mind that Wranglers can approach $30k and above. I can maybe see the Unlimited costing that much, but the regular Wrangler? And yeah Skoorb, that ride isn't great. Loud and rough. But I guess that's part of the charm for such a purpose-driven vehicle, or people are just willing to overlook it. Everyone knows the STi doesn't take bumps like a Cadillac, but most people buying that car don't care.
Just so you're aware, the only year that you were looking at in your search range of 2006 to 2010 that came with the 4.0 liter engine was 2006. The 2007 and later ones came with a V6.
For a vehicle high in demand, there sure are a shit-ton of them for sale though. I live in the sticks and searched within a 300 mile radius, and the search returned 733 results (and that was with filters for transmission, mileage, etc.). I could see them being priced so high if there were few for sale, but it looks like there are a lot more for sale than people buying them. Traditionally, I haven't ever considered purchasing a new vehicle. I know it makes sense in certain scenarios, but taking that major depreciation hit during the first year or two has never appealed to me. I bought my 2004 Maxima when it was 2 years old, fully loaded with everything except nav, for less than 1/2 of the original selling price. I financed for 4 years and paid it off in a little over 3. That's what I'd like to do with my next vehicle. And I'm in a better position financially now than I was then, so I'll have a much more substantial downpayment in addition to my trade-in or whatever I sell the Max for if I go that route. Buying a new vehicle in order to take advantage of better financing doesn't really appeal to me at this point, but I appreciate the suggestion.
Jeeps are secondary vehicles for a lot of people, and with the down economy you're going to find a lot of people trying to offload them. Also, there's plenty of people that love the thought or idea of a Jeep but can't live with the reality.
I realize that. I know you have to make compromises at any given price point. The Jeep obviously sacrifices a good ride and luxurious amenities in order to offer a tough package that's meant to go where crossovers can't. Just like an Acura will give you lots of bells and whistles and gadgets but isn't meant to stray far from paved roads. I realize sacrifices have to be made, and the Jeep certainly has strengths, but it still seems like they should cost less than they do. I likely wouldn't be taking it off-road, so some of its abilities would be going to waste, but they are visually appealing and one of the few vehicles that offer 4WD to get me through the winter while also allowing me to ride with an open top when the weather's nice. I'm glad you were able to find humor where none was intended, but here's the thing...unlike a lot of car buyers, I'm not really looking for a certain type of vehicle. I've typically been a car guy, as I rarely need to go off road or haul anything and I like the better fuel economy and acceleration that the cars I like afford. I owned a supercharged Miata 9 years ago, and impractical as it was, it was an absolute blast to drive. It was quick, handled like a go-kart, and the freedom I felt when dropping the top on a warm summer day (or night) was incredible. Being able to hear the whine of the supercharger and feel the wind blowing through my hair made all my worries disappear (ok, that's borderline cheesy, but you convertible owners know what I'm talking about). For this reason, I considered keeping my car and buying a motorcycle but after thinking on it for a year or so I've almost talked myself out of it. With the prevalence of cell phones, there are just too many idiots texting while driving and the adrenaline rush just isn't worth getting killed or seriously injured for. So I considered getting another convertible for my next car. Options that appeal to me: S2000 - Hold their value really well, decent fuel economy. But just about as impractical as my Miata and rather docile on the bottom end. 350Z Roadster - Torquier than the S2000, many say it's a better DD. Still somewhat impractical and the coupe version is IMO more attractive. The 370Z is more appealing and reportedly a structurally better-built convertible, but much better deals can be had on the older model. Mustang GT - Most powerful engine of them all, and damn do I love the sound of an American V8 (the convertible aspect makes this even better). Rear seats are a plus and it has more trunk room than the S2000 or 350Z. Interior quality OK but not up to par with Honda's...though significantly improved over the 1994 GT coupe I had prior to the Maxima. Fuel economy decent but not great (not a huge priority for me as my commute to work is about 5 miles). The new GT with the 412HP 5.0L is amazing, and the new V6 makes about as much power as the old V8 did, but again I do not want to buy a new car. All of the above are RWD. The Jeep would give me a compromise; a more practical vehicle with rear seats combined with 4WD and the ability to remove the top. To add to the hilarity, in addition to the sporty coupes and utilitarian Jeep, I'm also considering the TL and IS 250 as mentioned in the OP. I realize it's all about sacrifice and no one vehicle excels in all aspects. But should I decide that I can live without a convertible, I certainly wouldn't mind driving something with a bit of class and luxury. Front wheel drive is enough to get me through most snows, but I far prefer the feel of RWD. So there is much to think about, and I realize I'll have to make sacrifices and decide what I really want. But this thread wasn't intended to help me pick a new car, I am just trying to explain why I'm considering vastly different vehicles for my next purchase. Agreed. Just for S&Gs, what do you think about the Commander? The Liberty and Compass are just a joke IMO, but they obviously appeal to some buyers.
Actually I would probably say that 80%-90% of Jeep Wrangler buyers never take their Wrangler off road. Sorry, but that's just demographics. People buy cars for lots of reasons, and Wrangler gets the image, style, appeal, 4WD, and convertible SUV (the only one of its kind) for the majority of buyers. Fuel economy and seating, comfort and power not so much. The rest do buy it for taking it off-road, but they are the huge minority.
The Liberty isn't terrible, but it really shouldn't carry the Jeep name. The Compass - lol indeed The Commander - eh... my personal jury is still out on that one. Have heard it has decent capability, and is definitely geared to fill that utilitarian role... but I can't make my mind up on it. More unsettling is Car and Driver's take on the 2009 Limited model, they seem to just loathe the thing. Jeep certainly seems to remain as a brand with a two-vehicle fleet - the rest are just kind of riding along as the posse. Comically enough, the two vehicles I really see as the true Jeeps are the two assembled nearest to me: The Wrangler and Grand Cherokee. Personally, I love those two vehicles, but as for a vehicle with broader necessary uses, my next vehicle is likely going to be an AWD car. I've been scouring the next, just researching all the makes and models that match that little requirement of mine (and not very excited at the cost of entry into that little market niche). You mentioned the STI and I had to grin. The Impreza WRX and WRX STI have been toward the top of my list for awhile. Cost is going to be a big factor in my decision, but thankfully, I hopefully have a couple years before I really need to replace my Dakota. A few hours each way, once a month, is going to be terrifying in the winter if there is a nasty storm. Thus my demand for AWD, and the performance cars still have curb weight but also lower center-of-gravity. And I just like AWD in general, I like the responsiveness and handling. Lancer EVO sadly has a cost that just keeps skyrocketing, and tough decision between Lancer Ralliart (AWD, twin-clutch ) and the WRX. Still keeping my eye out for the revamped Dodge Charger for 2011, should retain an AWD option (and might be better than the previous years... perhaps not, though).
I won't argue there. But people who do buy it, even if just because of its iconic nature, still recognize the vehicle as one that is made to take punishment, and not made to look fancy.
This is so wrong it's funny, dude. First off, EVERY platform Jeep makes now has a TON of Chrysler in it. Even the Wrangler, which is totally a Chrysler abomination now that they did away with the classic 6-cylinder in 2007. Second, since when did Jeep make "some of the most dependable platforms out there"? Not since the 4.0 was put to bed, they haven't. They had some of the worst transmissions ever installed in a domestic engine. I'll concede they had a few models over the years that did pretty well, reliability-wise. The Grand Cherokee wasn't one of them, though. Chrysler is still building the worst vehicles that of the Big 3, and it's really not even close. All that said, the Rubicon Wrangler is unmatched in 4-wheeling. Nothing that is factory-stock can out-perform it. Too bad they put the ball-less V-6 in it, though.
Yes, unfortunately I would take an Xterra or FJ Cruiser most days over a Wrangler because of the extra amenities and modern drivetrain. Jeep fans have been complaining about the crappy V6 in the Wrangler for years and Chrysler does not really care.
When I was in the market for a small SUV a few years ago, I test drive a new 2008 Wrangler. The thing felt like a cheap econobox on big wheels. It didn't even feel like an earlier model jeep; felt like a lifted Chevy Cobalt.
