Thought I remember once Bill Gates pumping millions of dollars of capital into Apple once just to keep it afloat.
Yeah, not quite a cool billion and change though.
Thought I remember once Bill Gates pumping millions of dollars of capital into Apple once just to keep it afloat.
Here's more proof that none of this is happening:
http://www.pcworld.com/article/226682/amd_not_pursuing_arm_license_sticking_to_x86.html
I wonder what's going on then. Perhaps AMD is somehow going to "fuse" one of their GPUs to an ARM CPU, essentially licensing out their GPU tech to someone else.
Perhaps the initial rumor was complete nonsense.
Either that or it's all about getting more people on the OpenCL bandwagon. I suppose we'll find out soon enough.
It's easy to lay blame for AMD's woes at Intel's doorstep...but look at Apple. Apple competed against both Intel and Microsoft (still do), each virtual monopolies in their respective markets, and yet they managed to strike a very different, very profitable, path for themselves.
The consumer decides AMD's marketshare, not Intel. AMD could play a role in shifting the consumer's desire to buy AMD products, but it would take an actual marketing campaign (colgate toothpaste has more marketing than AMD) and/or a lowering of their prices (they ain't running a charity after all). They aren't powerless.
