Who would win in a fight? Lee vs. Seagal

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Zhou

Senior member
Feb 1, 2003
467
0
0
Originally posted by: MAME
Seagal could easily take Lee.

If you don't believe me, you have no idea what you're talking about

YOU have no idea what you're talking about.


Lee = 23948290384
Seagal = 1
 

MAME

Banned
Sep 19, 2003
9,281
1
0
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
Originally posted by: MAME
Seagal could easily take Lee.

If you don't believe me, you have no idea what you're talking about

HAHAHAHAHA

this is why i read ATOT. to read nonsense like this. it's soo stupid it's actually funny.

obviously you've never seen Under Siege
 

MAME

Banned
Sep 19, 2003
9,281
1
0
Originally posted by: Aharami
Originally posted by: MAME
Seagal could easily take Lee.

If you don't believe me, you have no idea what you're talking about

riiiiiiiight!
what fighting style did Seagal invent?

He didn't need to invert a new one because he already mastered fighting. Lee wasn't a good enough student so he had to "invent" a new one so no one would make fun of him (which they did already)
 

Dedpuhl

Lifer
Nov 20, 1999
10,370
0
76
Steven Seagal is an accomplished martial artist.

In a real fight, to the death, Lee would probably come out victorious based on speed alone.
 

MAME

Banned
Sep 19, 2003
9,281
1
0
Originally posted by: Zhou
Originally posted by: MAME
Seagal could easily take Lee.

If you don't believe me, you have no idea what you're talking about

YOU have no idea what you're talking about.


Lee = 23948290384
Seagal = 1

Counting losses?
 

RedPickle

Golden Member
Sep 25, 2002
1,973
0
0
Originally posted by: MAME
Originally posted by: Zhou
Originally posted by: MAME
Seagal could easily take Lee.

If you don't believe me, you have no idea what you're talking about

YOU have no idea what you're talking about.


Lee = 23948290384
Seagal = 1

Counting losses?

Lee will own Seagal. Are you stupid?
 

MAME

Banned
Sep 19, 2003
9,281
1
0
Originally posted by: RedPickle
Originally posted by: MAME
Originally posted by: Zhou
Originally posted by: MAME
Seagal could easily take Lee.

If you don't believe me, you have no idea what you're talking about

YOU have no idea what you're talking about.


Lee = 23948290384
Seagal = 1

Counting losses?

Lee will own Seagal. Are you stupid?

No, you are the one who is stupid!
 

AmbitV

Golden Member
Oct 20, 1999
1,197
0
0
"Do you understand the words comin outta my mouth"

Chris Tucker wins. Fatality!
 

Originally posted by: MAME
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
Originally posted by: MAME
Seagal could easily take Lee.

If you don't believe me, you have no idea what you're talking about

HAHAHAHAHA

this is why i read ATOT. to read nonsense like this. it's soo stupid it's actually funny.

obviously you've never seen Under Siege

since movies are obviously real
the bald guy with the pony tail could take anyone (if he had the green destiny and wasn't dead)
 

krunchykrome

Lifer
Dec 28, 2003
13,413
1
0
Originally posted by: JackHomer
Ok, Bruce Lee versus Steven Seagal both in their prime, who would win in a fight? A lot of my friends say that Seagal would win, but i think they are crazy!!! Bruce Lee would totally kick Seagal's tubby butt.

Lee would r@pe Steven. It's not even a fair question. "Who would win in a race off the line.....SL500 or a Toyota Echo?" Steven does not fight...all he does is push people around and slap them.
 

Sid59

Lifer
Sep 2, 2002
11,879
3
81
Originally posted by: deathkoba
If they stuck true to their martial arts, perhaps Lee would win. In a street fight, Segal would bust his ass.

because?

you do realize that the marital arts Bruce Lee practiced was a from many different styles? Sorta of like the great grandpa for Mixed Martial Arts.
 

brxndxn

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2001
8,475
0
76
I think Seagal would win hands down. Seagal is more than twice Lee's weight and more than a foot taller. Seagal is undoubtedly stronger.
 

konakona

Diamond Member
May 6, 2004
6,285
1
0
i cant think of a single human being that could beat bruce lee in his prime in hand-to-hand combat. maybe some ancient hero whose name we havnt even heard of, not anybody from this or past century at least...

by saying that i am not putting down segal either... heard he is real good with his akido. but did he ever write a book on fighting style?

my taiwanese friends used to tell me jet li is all about the show. i wouldnt be surprised a single bit if jackie chan smacked him easily
 

konakona

Diamond Member
May 6, 2004
6,285
1
0
those of you who claim bruce lee would lose in street fight... ever heard of Jeet Kune Do? it was Bruce Lee who always criticized impracticalness of traditional martial arts... just go read his book, its a good read :)
 

styrafoam

Platinum Member
Jun 18, 2002
2,684
0
0
If you have any doubts about Lee try to catch this next time it is on. Lee was skilled enough to fend off/trounce fighters who challenged him left and right. These were people who fought for the honor of the "old school" masters in China, not exactly amatures. Bruce basicly had a price on his head for teaching the techniques he had learned in China to the western world, the fact that he shared his kung fu was looked down upon by many in Hong Kong.
 

MAME

Banned
Sep 19, 2003
9,281
1
0
Originally posted by: jntdesign
Originally posted by: MAME
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
Originally posted by: MAME
Seagal could easily take Lee.

If you don't believe me, you have no idea what you're talking about

HAHAHAHAHA

this is why i read ATOT. to read nonsense like this. it's soo stupid it's actually funny.

obviously you've never seen Under Siege

since movies are obviously real
the bald guy with the pony tail could take anyone (if he had the green destiny and wasn't dead)

seagal doesn't need a sword
 

Originally posted by: MAME
Originally posted by: jntdesign
Originally posted by: MAME

obviously you've never seen Under Siege

since movies are obviously real
the bald guy with the pony tail could take anyone (if he had the green destiny and wasn't dead)

seagal doesn't need a sword

but the sword wasn't the point of my post
...btw, i left out "from Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon" after "the bald guy" :\
 

MAME

Banned
Sep 19, 2003
9,281
1
0
Originally posted by: jntdesign
Originally posted by: MAME
Originally posted by: jntdesign
Originally posted by: MAME

obviously you've never seen Under Siege

since movies are obviously real
the bald guy with the pony tail could take anyone (if he had the green destiny and wasn't dead)

seagal doesn't need a sword

but the sword wasn't the point of my post
...btw, i left out "from Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon" after "the bald guy" :\

he just uses his hands and wins
 

slycat

Diamond Member
Jul 18, 2001
5,656
0
0
lee will kill seagal...easy.

lee used to troll oakland a LOT when he lived in SF. he went around fighting black dudes 3x
his size.

seagal is a camera fighter, not a REAL street fighter.