Who will replace Howard Stern ?

mzkhadir

Diamond Member
Mar 6, 2003
9,509
1
76
Infinity Outlines Plan to Replace Howard Stern

A little more than two months before Howard Stern takes his lucrative but polarizing morning show to satellite radio, his current employer, Infinity Broadcasting, announced plans today to replace him with a regional slate of hosts, including the former Van Halen singer David Lee Roth and the comedian Adam Carolla.

Mr. Roth, whose show will be heard on the east coast, including New York, Philadelphia, Boston and Pittsburgh, is a newcomer to radio. Mr. Carolla, who has television shows on Comedy Central and TLC, has enjoyed success at the co-host of the "Loveline," a nationally syndicated radio show. His new morning show will be broadcast in Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Diego, Phoenix, Portland and Las Vegas, and his former partner, the late-night talk-show host and comedian Jimmy Kimmel, will serve as a creative consultant to the show as well as an adviser to Infinity.

Other hosts in Infinity's strategy for replacing Stern include Rover, a radio personality who will add five more Infinity stations to the two in Cleveland and Columbus that he is currently heard on, and the Junkies, who will add Baltimore to their Washington base.

Infinity's strategy is recognition of the long-time popularity of Mr. Stern and the foolhardiness of trying to find one big name to take his spot during morning drive time. The company is also using Mr. Stern's departure to do more than overhaul its morning shows in 27 markets - it is flipping station formats across the country, including introducing a variation on the talk radio format called Free FM. The new talk format, billed as a hybrid of politics, sports and pop culture, will be heard on nine Infinity stations, including WXRK-FM in New York; some markets, like Philadelphia, will make the switch as early as today.

Infinity has also signed Penn Jillette, the boisterous half of the comedy-magic duo Penn & Teller, to be the host of a one-hour daily talk show in markets including New York, Chicago and San Francisco.

Infinity's announcement is intended in part to stave off what many analysts predict will be a scattering of Mr. Stern's millions of listeners. Already, competing radio stations have been laying claim to Stern fans, marketing themselves as a worthy (and free) alternative ahead of his jump to Sirius.

Infinity's preparation began a year ago, when Mr. Stern announced he was forsaking commercial radio for Sirius Satellite Radio, lured by a five-year, $500 million deal and the freedom to perform without the oversight of the Federal Communications Commission. His last show for Infinity is scheduled for Dec. 16.

Mr. Stern's ratings have slipped recently in nearly all of the major markets he has long dominated. In the recently released summer ratings report tallied by Arbitron, Mr. Stern lost listeners in the 25- to 54-year-old age group in six of the top nine markets compared to the summer of 2004, including New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Philadelphia and Washington. In overall listeners, ratings dropped in seven of nine markets.

Despite the dip, Mr. Stern still attracts more than six million weekly listeners, and his show represents a cash cow for Infinity that will be hard to replace. Mr. Stern brings in about $100 million in revenue and $50 million in cash flow for Infinity, part of Viacom.

"We're going to take a hit, no question about it," said Joel Hollander, chairman and chief executive of Infinity.

But Mr. Hollander said Mr. Stern's departure offers the company an opportunity to pursue advertisers who have shunned the show, turned off by Mr. Stern's risqué antics.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/25/busin...730449d504151&ei=5094&partner=homepage
 

Starbuck1975

Lifer
Jan 6, 2005
14,698
1,909
126
No one will ever replace Howard Stern...it now becomes a question of whether or not terrestrial radio can develop formats to attract the market segment necessary to survive.

Cable television was not the death bell for the major television networks, but cable programming is far superior to anything on the television networks because cable does not have to contend with the ridiculous censorship constraints.

The same will happen with satellite...Howard Stern will continue to strive on Sirius, and perhaps make it a lucrative and viable alternative...terrestrial radio will continue to exist, but not for people seeking shock jock entertainment.
 

aswedc

Diamond Member
Oct 25, 2000
3,543
0
76
Originally posted by: Starbuck1975
Cable television was not the death bell for the major television networks, but cable programming is far superior to anything on the television networks because cable does not have to contend with the ridiculous censorship constraints.
Uh, no. Network programming is much better than cable, and the ratings back that up. Shows like LOST, 24, and Family Guy regularly spawn multiple page threads. Ever see something like that for a cable show? Plus, South Park, which is probably the most edgy thing on cable is now being aired on network TV.
 

Anubis

No Lifer
Aug 31, 2001
78,712
427
126
tbqhwy.com
Originally posted by: aswedc
Originally posted by: Starbuck1975
Cable television was not the death bell for the major television networks, but cable programming is far superior to anything on the television networks because cable does not have to contend with the ridiculous censorship constraints.
Uh, no. Network programming is much better than cable, and the ratings back that up. Shows like LOST, 24, and Family Guy regularly spawn multiple page threads. Ever see something like that for a cable show? Plus, South Park, which is probably the most edgy thing on cable is now being aired on network TV.

yes but its SP reruns

and just about any show on HBO is = to or greater then all those you mentioned
 

mzkhadir

Diamond Member
Mar 6, 2003
9,509
1
76
Originally posted by: aswedc
Originally posted by: Starbuck1975
Cable television was not the death bell for the major television networks, but cable programming is far superior to anything on the television networks because cable does not have to contend with the ridiculous censorship constraints.
Uh, no. Network programming is much better than cable, and the ratings back that up. Shows like LOST, 24, and Family Guy regularly spawn multiple page threads. Ever see something like that for a cable show? Plus, South Park, which is probably the most edgy thing on cable is now being aired on network TV.

I have seen that on channel 26, south park. You are partially right. In cable/satellite programming, I like some channels better than others.
 

aswedc

Diamond Member
Oct 25, 2000
3,543
0
76
Originally posted by: Pepsi90919
Originally posted by: toekramp
Adam Carolla is the man
fixed
May I ask, have you ever watched Too Late with Adam Carolla? If you have, the show needs you in the studio right away. They cancelled the live audience because they couldn't find enough people willing to sit through his crap.
 

aswedc

Diamond Member
Oct 25, 2000
3,543
0
76
Originally posted by: Anubis
Originally posted by: aswedc
Originally posted by: Starbuck1975
Cable television was not the death bell for the major television networks, but cable programming is far superior to anything on the television networks because cable does not have to contend with the ridiculous censorship constraints.
Uh, no. Network programming is much better than cable, and the ratings back that up. Shows like LOST, 24, and Family Guy regularly spawn multiple page threads. Ever see something like that for a cable show? Plus, South Park, which is probably the most edgy thing on cable is now being aired on network TV.

yes but its SP reruns

and just about any show on HBO is = to or greater then all those you mentioned
A subscription channel is different from cable.
 

Starbuck1975

Lifer
Jan 6, 2005
14,698
1,909
126
Uh, no. Network programming is much better than cable, and the ratings back that up. Shows like LOST, 24, and Family Guy regularly spawn multiple page threads. Ever see something like that for a cable show? Plus, South Park, which is probably the most edgy thing on cable is now being aired on network TV.

Of course network television is going to generate more discussion, as it is free...and readily accessible to the masses.

But nothing on network television can even touch miniseries and shows like Band of Brothers, the Sopranos, Battlestar Galactica etc.

While not a fan of Sex in the City, it was still far wittier and provocative then any of the network sitcoms.

No network in its right mind would have even touched something as edgy as South Park with a ten foot pole...but since a cable network showed that the formula was commercially viable, it is now available through syndication on network television.

A subscription channel is different from cable.
Suscription channels are an extension of cable.


 

Hossenfeffer

Diamond Member
Jul 16, 2000
7,462
1
0
Not really interested, myself. More interested in whether I care enough to subscribe to satellite. Never was a howard stern listener until he joined the seattle market. I can take a good percentage of his stuff. Interested to see how it translates when he's not censored.