Who should/should not be on the lists...

Status
Not open for further replies.

zsdersw

Lifer
Oct 29, 2003
10,505
2
0
... in my signature?

Throughout my time browsing P&N I've made the observations listed below of who is a Republican shill, a Democratic shill, level-headed truth-speaker, and out-of-this-world crazy diamond.

What additions/deletions should I make to which lists?


Member callout threads are not allowed.

Administrator Idontcare
 
Last edited by a moderator:

thraashman

Lifer
Apr 10, 2000
11,112
1,587
126
I'm not exactly sure if this qualifies as a callout thread on other forum members. So this might not be allowed. Having said that I'm kinda surprised you don't have craig listed on there even though my only complaint about him is that he posts too many tl;dr posts.

I'll even cross party lines here to say that one of the more reasonible individuals that has a clear political leaning is werepossum. I disagree with him politically on many things, but he's shown some of the most willingness on these boards to be reasonible in his arguments and views.
 

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
37,159
32,590
136
...

I'll even cross party lines here to say that one of the more reasonible individuals that has a clear political leaning is werepossum. I disagree with him politically on many things, but he's shown some of the most willingness on these boards to be reasonible in his arguments and views.
I do not agree with this. He is better than most but it's almost as if he has a split personality. Sometimes he is level headed and other times he latches onto and openly agrees with posts that are blatant fallacies. Unfortunately, better than most isn't enough to qualify for 'truth-speaker.'

Also, zsdersw, your list should include Independant shills for those people that think all federal government is bad without exception. Maybe Libertarian shills as well.
 
Last edited:

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
66,090
14,495
146
If I believed in participating in member call outs, I'd have to recommend that Anarchist420 definitely belongs on the "Space Cadet" list...

But I don't, so............
 

ichy

Diamond Member
Oct 5, 2006
6,940
8
81
Craig is a Democratic shill. Definitely about Anarchist420 as a space cadet.

JEDIYoda is an Israeli shill.
 

HumblePie

Lifer
Oct 30, 2000
14,665
440
126
LOL boomerD..... I'm not saying I am agreeing with you or anything, but I am laughing right now.
 

Theb

Diamond Member
Feb 28, 2006
3,533
9
76
What makes a man turn neutral ... Lust for gold? Power? Or were you just born with a heart full of neutrality? - Zapp Brannigan
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,617
6,717
126
"The above is probably just my usual sarcasm and in no way reflects my real opinion (and,or) may include subtleties of sufficient rarity as to appear to the unsuspecting like total gibberish. It may not be so much a matter that I'm far out, but rather that you have never been anywhere."

Try to understand that I saw you coming lo these many years. Because you know so little I must look like a space cadet. It's how you protect yourself from becoming aware of your ignorance.
 
Sep 7, 2009
12,960
3
0
"The above is probably just my usual sarcasm and in no way reflects my real opinion (and,or) may include subtleties of sufficient rarity as to appear to the unsuspecting like total gibberish. It may not be so much a matter that I'm far out, but rather that you have never been anywhere."

Try to understand that I saw you coming lo these many years. Because you know so little I must look like a space cadet. It's how you protect yourself from becoming aware of your ignorance.


I missed you, moonbeam.
 

Thump553

Lifer
Jun 2, 2000
12,837
2,622
136
Without meaning to be insulting, the lists in your signature are really relevant only to those who consider you the be-all, end-all in such matters and I quite frankly ask who appointed you The Decider(TM) on those issues?

Personally I think it is a matter of individual decision and individual responsibility of each and every reader to reach their own conclusions as to the merits of each poster.

BTW, lumping moonie and nemesis together is beyond absurd.
 

zsdersw

Lifer
Oct 29, 2003
10,505
2
0
Without meaning to be insulting, the lists in your signature are really relevant only to those who consider you the be-all, end-all in such matters and I quite frankly ask who appointed you The Decider(TM) on those issues?

Personally I think it is a matter of individual decision and individual responsibility of each and every reader to reach their own conclusions as to the merits of each poster.

BTW, lumping moonie and nemesis together is beyond absurd.

I make no claims about the significance or relevance of the lists in my signature.
 

DrPizza

Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
Mar 5, 2001
49,601
167
111
www.slatebrookfarm.com
For the record, since you made a thread about this, the signature has been allowed to remain simply because those in the signature haven't complained.
-Admin DrPizza
 

cybrsage

Lifer
Nov 17, 2011
13,021
0
0
You need to add a "clearly holds a double standard" entry and put yourself on it. Unless you wish to be dishonest, then keep the list as it is.
 

schneiderguy

Lifer
Jun 26, 2006
10,801
91
91
I do not agree with this. He is better than most but it's almost as if he has a split personality. Sometimes he is level headed and other times he latches onto and openly agrees with posts that are blatant fallacies. Unfortunately, better than most isn't enough to qualify for 'truth-speaker.'

Also, zsdersw, your list should include Independant shills for those people that think all federal government is bad without exception. Maybe Libertarian shills as well.

Libertarians are automatically Truth Speakers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.