Originally posted by: Perry404
Who should Ron Paul choose as a running mate when he wins the Republican primary?
Anyone given any thought to this?
Originally posted by: Perry404
Who should Ron Paul choose as a running mate when he wins the Republican primary?
Anyone given any thought to this?
Originally posted by: Perry404
Who should Ron Paul choose as a running mate when he wins the Republican primary?
Anyone given any thought to this?
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Definitely Denis Kucinich.
Originally posted by: Shivetya
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Definitely Denis Kucinich.
We have a winner.
They could even share tinfoil hats together!
Originally posted by: Shivetya
Originally posted by: Perry404
Who should Ron Paul choose as a running mate when he wins the Republican primary?
Anyone given any thought to this?
Candidates.
Elvis
JFK
The Easter Bunny
John Edwards
Originally posted by: Perry404
Who should Ron Paul choose as a running mate when he wins the Republican primary?
Anyone given any thought to this?
Originally posted by: nick1985
Are you serious? When he doesnt even come close do we have the right to rub this in your face?
Originally posted by: magomago
See what I find is sad is that I see no reason why he can't be an equally appreciated candidate with the rest of the Republicans (although considering the crops of republicans...this isn't saying much. IMO the democrats are nothing either - with obama being the only exception simply because he is much more fresh) in this.
The republicans choices are generally poor - and all the democrat choices are generally poor as well ; why does it have to be a a name race where the person will get elected based on how many people know of him?
I don't think Ron will haev a chance because the establishment doesn't like him and continuously try to push him away simply because he doesn't have the massive financial backing, as well as the household name. And IMO, to see any republican elected over him just shows that in the end its about money, politics of politics, and names and NOT what you stand for.
He's realistic about it, he knows he has to change the mindset of the people and understand if they want a nanny state or if they want liberty. He knows people depend on the status quo and he would slowly transition from the entitlement system with reasonable measures starting with good monetary policy and limiting inflation for the poor. He doesn't plan on killing every government agency right off the bat, it wouldn't have the support in congress.Originally posted by: sirjonk
Please. Paul wants to abolish nearly every federal agency in existence (Dept of Education, homeland security, CIA, IRS, etc) and withdraw from or abolish most international agencies like the UN and NATO. There's no conspiracy against him. He's on the fringe because he is a fringe candidate.Originally posted by: magomago
See what I find is sad is that I see no reason why he can't be an equally appreciated candidate with the rest of the Republicans (although considering the crops of republicans...this isn't saying much. IMO the democrats are nothing either - with obama being the only exception simply because he is much more fresh) in this.
The republicans choices are generally poor - and all the democrat choices are generally poor as well ; why does it have to be a a name race where the person will get elected based on how many people know of him?
I don't think Ron will haev a chance because the establishment doesn't like him and continuously try to push him away simply because he doesn't have the massive financial backing, as well as the household name. And IMO, to see any republican elected over him just shows that in the end its about money, politics of politics, and names and NOT what you stand for.
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Joe Lieberman
Originally posted by: iamaelephant
Ron who?
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
Ron who???
Originally posted by: dababus
Originally posted by: iamaelephant
Ron who?
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
Ron who???
Check my signature.