it never leaves you once you've been there... and there are plenty of decent General-grade officers who retired more recently. In fact, there are Generals and Admirals retiring every year who may have even seen "action" in Iraq and/or Afghanistan. any one of them should be considered for the job before another useless civilian...Originally posted by: piasabird
Why should the president change Rummy now? The Generals claim they like the guy. Why would you trust some stupid retired general that has not seen action in 20 years?
Originally posted by: EagleKeeper
In Bush's mind, dumping Rumsfeld would be stating that Bush's judgement is flawed and that the critics were right.
I do not see that happening at all. Should that have been possible; it would have been before the 04 elections.
Originally posted by: EagleKeeper
In Bush's mind, dumping Rumsfeld would be stating that Bush's judgement is flawed and that the critics were right.
I do not see that happening at all. Should that have been possible; it would have been before the 04 elections.
Originally posted by: palehorse74
it never leaves you once you've been there... and there are plenty of decent General-grade officers who retired more recently. In fact, there are Generals and Admirals retiring every year who may have even seen "action" in Iraq and/or Afghanistan. any one of them should be considered for the job before another useless civilian...Originally posted by: piasabird
Why should the president change Rummy now? The Generals claim they like the guy. Why would you trust some stupid retired general that has not seen action in 20 years?
Originally posted by: Drakkon
zombie patton...if there was ever a general that could lead us to victory against the sand monkeys it would be him...even in zombie form be a better defence secretary than rumsfield.