Who Killed More People in the Bible..

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,986
3,320
126
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Originally posted by: SuperSix
Neither, the bible is simply fiction.

This would be the correct answer, given that there is NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER that either God or Satan actually exists.

There is no evidence they don`t exist......if i am wrong please correct me...
 

flxnimprtmscl

Diamond Member
Jan 30, 2003
7,962
2
0
Originally posted by: chambersc
Originally posted by: flxnimprtmscl
Originally posted by: chambersc
Originally posted by: SuperSix
Neither, the bible is simply fiction.

I think we have already established this as fact.

Just out of curiosity, and to play Devil's advocate, how have you established that the entire Bible is fiction? What absolute undisputable facts do you have for us that disprove the whole of the Bible? I'll be most interested to hear this.

Name me one thing that has happend in the Bible that, through scientific research, has happened as it is described in the text.

I'm not arguing one way or the other. I'm simply asking you to back up your asertion. Just let me know if you're unable to do that. A simple no will do if you can't.
 

Kirby

Lifer
Apr 10, 2006
12,028
2
0
Isaiah 13: 5-11 They come from a far country, from the end of heaven, even the Lord, and the weapons of his wrath to destroy all the land. Howl for the day of YHWH is at hand. It shall come as destruction from the almighty...Behold the day of the Lord comes, cruel both with wrath and fierce anger, to lay the land desolate: and he shall destroy the sinners thereof out of it...And I will punish the world for their evil, and the wicked for their iniquity; and I will cause the arrogance of the proud to cease, and will lay low the haughtiness of the terrible.
 

spunkz

Golden Member
Jul 16, 2003
1,467
0
76
Originally posted by: everman
Originally posted by: chambersc

Name me one thing that has happend in the Bible that, through scientific research, has happened as it is described in the text.

There is no question about Jesus being a real person. There are other historical events which we know happened, IE: Cyrus invaded Babylon and set thousands of Jews free.

The siege of Jerusalem by Sennacherib and his subsequent murder by his own son have been confirmed through archaeology, as have many other events recorded in the bible involving Assyrian, Babylonian, and Persian leaders. The Hittite civilization was described in the bible long before the modern discovery of their existence. Jericho was a real city where the walls were found to have fallen outward. Archaeology continues to confirm the existence of ancient cities, places, and leaders that were named in the bible.

The timing and scale of biblical events is what is generally contested rather than that they actually happened(obviously excluding specific acts of God, such as creation). The conquest of Jericho by the Jews could have happened 100 years after the walls fell, when it was only a small village. The great flood could have just covered part of the Middle East. Still, the bible shouldn't be ignored historically. Many of the respected ancient historians spoke at times of divine intervention and included exaggerated statistics, yet they are still respected for their general accuracy while the bible is often dismissed as entirely fiction. I think the bible is a great tool as a source of wisdom and as a rich historical record that should not be overlooked simply because it is used as a religious text.
 

LordMaul

Lifer
Nov 16, 2000
15,168
1
0
One thing I've always wondered...YHWH is how its been spelled everytime I see it, but it's pronounced "Yahweh" or something along those lines. How do they know that's what to put inbetween the letters? What if it was really an acronym, like "Your Hot 'n' Wild Holyman" or something? Sounds rather hubristic to assume like that. ;)
 

hellokeith

Golden Member
Nov 12, 2004
1,664
0
0
By giving angels and humans freewill, God allowed that some might choose another path besides His. The devil introduced Sin into the world, and "the wages of sin is death". So it is quite obvious satan killed billions of more people, due to the introduction of sin, causing the fall of a perfect creation.
 

Martin

Lifer
Jan 15, 2000
29,178
1
81
Originally posted by: LordMaul
One thing I've always wondered...YHWH is how its been spelled everytime I see it, but it's pronounced "Yahweh" or something along those lines. How do they know that's what to put inbetween the letters? What if it was really an acronym, like "Your Hot 'n' Wild Holyman" or something? Sounds rather hubristic to assume like that. ;)

arabic and hebrew (according to an arabic-speaking freind of mine) do not have vowels (or at least, not to the extent english does), so they have to be inferred. Kinda like if I write "grr", you know to pronounce it "gurr" and not "geerr"
 

LordMaul

Lifer
Nov 16, 2000
15,168
1
0
Originally posted by: Martin
Originally posted by: LordMaul
One thing I've always wondered...YHWH is how its been spelled everytime I see it, but it's pronounced "Yahweh" or something along those lines. How do they know that's what to put inbetween the letters? What if it was really an acronym, like "Your Hot 'n' Wild Holyman" or something? Sounds rather hubristic to assume like that. ;)

arabic and hebrew (according to an arabic-speaking freind of mine) do not have vowels (or at least, not to the extent english does), so they have to be inferred. Kinda like if I write "grr", you know to pronounce it "gurr" and not "geerr"

That is a horrible analogy, you twit. "Grr" sounds to me like a nonstandard onomatopoeic word, imitating an actual growl. Therefore, the sound is already essentially known, as it is a known sound, not something you have to infer. Still, if you have no idea how something is supposed to sound, how can you "infer" that "YHWH" is "yahweh"?

You obviously have no idea what you're talking about. Go play hockey and leave the thinking to us well-educated upper-middle-class suburban Americans, eh?



(ahahahahahahaha :p)
 

Martin

Lifer
Jan 15, 2000
29,178
1
81
Originally posted by: LordMaul
Originally posted by: Martin
Originally posted by: LordMaul
One thing I've always wondered...YHWH is how its been spelled everytime I see it, but it's pronounced "Yahweh" or something along those lines. How do they know that's what to put inbetween the letters? What if it was really an acronym, like "Your Hot 'n' Wild Holyman" or something? Sounds rather hubristic to assume like that. ;)

arabic and hebrew (according to an arabic-speaking freind of mine) do not have vowels (or at least, not to the extent english does), so they have to be inferred. Kinda like if I write "grr", you know to pronounce it "gurr" and not "geerr"

That is a horrible analogy, you twit. "Grr" sounds to me like a nonstandard onomatopoeic word, imitating an actual growl. Therefore, the sound is already essentially known, as it is a known sound, not something you have to infer. Still, if you have no idea how something is supposed to sound, how can you "infer" that "YHWH" is "yahweh"?

You obviously have no idea what you're talking about. Go play hockey and leave the thinking to us well-educated upper-middle-class suburban Americans, eh?



(ahahahahahahaha :p)

well, writing itself is little more than putting already known sounds in writing. But if the analogy was bad, it was only because I was aware of the need to oversimplify for my LordMaul-ish readership.

Had you been more worldly and more learned, I would have said it was more akin to the differences between Serbian and Bulgarian, whereby the pronounciation of words like "????????? ??????" has to be inferred, even though it could be more rationally written as "????????? ???????".

Now stop worrying about things and let the adults talk. You go to bed and get your (much needed) beauty sleep.
 

Kadarin

Lifer
Nov 23, 2001
44,296
15
81
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Originally posted by: SuperSix
Neither, the bible is simply fiction.

This would be the correct answer, given that there is NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER that either God or Satan actually exists.

There is no evidence they don`t exist......if i am wrong please correct me...

That is no reason to go believe in something. There are any number of concepts, beings, and things I can dream up to believe in, about which you could postulate the same silly argument.
 

cKGunslinger

Lifer
Nov 29, 1999
16,408
57
91
Originally posted by: chambersc
Originally posted by: SuperSix
Neither, the bible is simply fiction.

I think we have already established this as fact.

In the relative sense of the Bible, it is merely pointed out by the graphic that God killed an enormously enormous amount more than Satan.

Omniscient and Omnipotent my ass.

How exactly does "all-knowing" and "all-powerful" conflict with "killed a lot of people?" :confused:

 

boomdart

Senior member
Jan 10, 2004
825
0
0
Number's all wrong... way more than 2mill, bible doesn't give us numbers for the deaths caused by the plagues of egypt, noah's flood, etc...
 

boomdart

Senior member
Jan 10, 2004
825
0
0
Originally posted by: Sqube
That God was a baaaaad motherfvcker.

So who did Satan kill besides Job's family? My Bible kung-fu is weak; were there 10 people in his family?

Aye, I think so anyway... it was the only time satan was allowed to take a life, satan's not allowed to kill anyone.
 

Janet Reno

Member
Apr 29, 2005
104
0
0
I AM BRILLIANT IN MY OWN MIND.

THEREFORE, BECAUSE FAMILY GUY SAID SO, I BELIEVE THE BIBLE TO BE FALSE.

I AM ALSO NOT A SLAVE TO THIS WORLD.
 

cKGunslinger

Lifer
Nov 29, 1999
16,408
57
91
Originally posted by: Janet Reno
I AM BRILLIANT IN MY OWN MIND.

THEREFORE, BECAUSE FAMILY GUY SAID SO, I BELIEVE THE BIBLE TO BE FALSE.

I AM ALSO NOT A SLAVE TO THIS WORLD.

You should probably just go back to lurking.
 

JackBurton

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
15,993
14
81
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Originally posted by: SuperSix
Neither, the bible is simply fiction.

This would be the correct answer, given that there is NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER that either God or Satan actually exists.

There is no evidence they don`t exist......if i am wrong please correct me...

You're right, just like there is no evidence magic fairies don't exist. If I am wrong, please correct me. :)
 

chambersc

Diamond Member
Feb 11, 2005
6,247
0
0
Originally posted by: JackBurton
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Originally posted by: SuperSix
Neither, the bible is simply fiction.

This would be the correct answer, given that there is NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER that either God or Satan actually exists.

There is no evidence they don`t exist......if i am wrong please correct me...

You're right, just like there is no evidence magic fairies don't exist. If I am wrong, please correct me. :)

Absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.
 

Miramonti

Lifer
Aug 26, 2000
28,651
100
91
Originally posted by: chambersc
Originally posted by: JackBurton
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Originally posted by: SuperSix
Neither, the bible is simply fiction.

This would be the correct answer, given that there is NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER that either God or Satan actually exists.

There is no evidence they don`t exist......if i am wrong please correct me...

You're right, just like there is no evidence magic fairies don't exist. If I am wrong, please correct me. :)

Absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.

However presense of absence is absence of presense. ;)
 

Greyd

Platinum Member
Dec 4, 2001
2,119
0
0
Originally posted by: flxnimprtmscl
Originally posted by: chambersc
Originally posted by: flxnimprtmscl
Originally posted by: chambersc
Originally posted by: SuperSix
Neither, the bible is simply fiction.

I think we have already established this as fact.

Just out of curiosity, and to play Devil's advocate, how have you established that the entire Bible is fiction? What absolute undisputable facts do you have for us that disprove the whole of the Bible? I'll be most interested to hear this.

Name me one thing that has happend in the Bible that, through scientific research, has happened as it is described in the text.

I'm not arguing one way or the other. I'm simply asking you to back up your asertion. Just let me know if you're unable to do that. A simple no will do if you can't.


HEY! Who said you could bring logical thought into this thread???!!! Conform to the ATOT way and demand that the Bible be fiction! No I haven't read it or studied it. What do you think this is? A logical discussion????!!!