• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Who do you think would gain most from driver optimization?

Mech0z

Senior member
Well from what I can hear neither of drivers are close to perfect for Vista (Which is sorta understandable, its not that old yet) But which who would gain most?

Like people tend to say that ati needs to get their AA fixed etc.
 
But from what I read Crossfire it sometimes performce lesser good than a single card which is... well not very acceptable.
 
Originally posted by: Mech0z
But from what I read Crossfire it sometimes performce lesser good than a single card which is... well not very acceptable.

if so maybe they should turn off one card in their 'optimization'.
 
AMD have a more sophisticated tech in their hardware. The problem is that it really hinges on their shader compiler speed. Technically they should blow Nvidia out of the water but there is something clogging the sink. Nvidia usually has a wide open valve, even if sometimes they let IQ falter in the process. ATI drivers usually act like an injection of Drano. I don't upgrade my 7800GT drivers all that often, because there is never a real improvement in speed so I gave up. Also, there are a lot less bug fixes in games because a lot of games are made on Nvidia tech. ATI on the otherhand, I upgrade every patch because even if they don't have major fixes for hardware in that particular version it usually has a slew of game fixes.
 
Back
Top