-
We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.
Who do you think made a better deomocatic senate leader?
- Thread starter JEDI
- Start date
good lord, i know i'm just an evil republican, but i truly feel that democrats should be more concerned about the real face of the democratic party, and that's howard dean. i have many democrats in my church, and they simply can't stand the man, he makes so many political gaffs. my advice to the democratic party, and i say this sincerely, ditch howard dean as soon as possible and appoint a more likeable guy, or at least a better strategist, or even someone who doesn't unload on the press and say such controversial things... i'd actually recommend democrats appoint someone like john edwards, who is a likeable fellow, is well-spoken, and doesn't seem so venemous.
again, i know i'm an just an evil republican and servant of the sith lord, George Bush, but would at least one democrat agree with me on this matter? That Dean really needs to go?
again, i know i'm an just an evil republican and servant of the sith lord, George Bush, but would at least one democrat agree with me on this matter? That Dean really needs to go?
dmcowen674
No Lifer
Good lord, would a priest be best suited for the role of chairman of the Democratic party?
Dean's worst gaffes are when he quotes scripture. He doesn't do it very well. But as far as organizing the party, his job really hasn't been evaluated, has it? Terry McCauliffe (sp) was a disaster the Clintons' left the DNC with. And besides, the GOP loves having Dean there to make blunt statements (their verity can be debated later, it's better focus on a comments' appropriateness, no?). Dean also showed the most innovative method of raising a lot of money through small contributions. This will be more and more important going forward, as the GOP lockhold on power has given them the ability to starve revenues from big business towards the Dems.
How could someone in the GOP recommend Dean's stepping down when DeLay's still in Congress, and Rumsfeld's still in office?
Talk about an embaressment / vice for his party.
How could someone in the GOP recommend Dean's stepping down when DeLay's still in Congress, and Rumsfeld's still in office?
Talk about an embaressment / vice for his party.
What is there to "back up?" Have the Democrats won control of any facet of government in the last decade? The courts? The House? The Senate? More governorships? What? What have they done for us lately?
Do they even have an agenda? They are doing the same nonsense that cost them the '04 elections and even Democratic strategists are saying that the chances of them winning anything anytime soon is next to none.
So how about you "back it up" and tell me what they have done to get their heads out of the sand? What have they accomplished? Drugs for seniors? Ugh, no, that issues was stolen by the Democrats...a super majority is only a few seats away in the Senate....and thanks to Moore/Moveon/et al, it looks like that seed might reach fruition and bare fruit in 2008. America has time and time again followed the Democrats' agenda and "Just said No!" No Moore...no Daschle....no moveon...no Dean...no Democrats controlling any part of government and its institutions.
cKGunslinger
Lifer
Yeah, ntdz! Who do you think you are, Dave? BBond? Darkhawk28? EatSpam? Todd33? etc..
More African Americans are looking at the Republican party...unions are breaking up and their bargaining power diluted...Dean was supposed to exacerbate donations flowing into DNC coffers, but is sadly failing to compete with Republicans...they are not in decline, though. They are stronger than ever! :roll: It won't be long before the DNC is as irrelevant as the UN...