I think that myself, Bush, Romney, and Senator Clinton all have average deductive reasoning, that we cannot reason inductively, that we use too much inductive logic, that we are easily fooled due to our inability to live exclusively in the moment or the future, that our logic obscures the truth, and that the terrorist attacks of 9/11 would've been prevented had Nader, Harry Browne, or Ron Paul been president then. Al Gore definitely would've learned and stopped future attacks if he had not prevented them outright. But he would've had way too many costs and he may have set up more surveillance here after taking out those responsible.
Jeff Bergner (if I am not mistaken) never wanted Bush-scale surveillance at home, but he wanted the arabs to self destruct by u.s. presence abroad if i understand correctly (I didn't think that until recently). he was very supportive of israelis and americans. He is naturally a good man whom I can say that I love and an Idealist in the mold of Trotsky (he became disillusioned by New Left and Great Society) and as such could never be elected head of State with men like me around. Unlike Bush, he was more frequently able to see and understand risk and sometimes minimize it. But what he wanted will never happen. The next President won't allow it. America will never be restored like Ron Paul would like it to and the fact that it won't be is what sucks most and is the most definite. ENTPs and INFJs are theoretically the least harmful and best Presidents respectively although Van Buren is the only one who was INFJ (or at least the only ISTP with a damn-well developed "inferior function") and the only one of the idealist temperment. Ron Paul could never get elected because of people like me. I worry that I will feel threatened like Pilate felt to stop Ron Paul (or someone else) from being king. I love Ron Paul and I want as many people as possible without aggression being used to know that.
Obama is more like Jefferson psychologically (and his mother probably looked like Jefferson's mother). Like Jefferson, Obama has excellent inductive reasoning while both men were almost as unaware of their environments as Bush was of his and I think Obama's ability to connect the dots while being non-committal is what has stopped attacks for now. Due to his inductive reasoning, Obama gives many signals when terrorism needs more uniformity to strike. Obama is a good man and I apologize for once supporting and even advocating violence against him (like I have done on these forums and like I have done elsewhere respectively). I think Jefferson would've endorse Obama over Romney if he wanted to endorse either.
So I would have to say that those who really want more of Obama would be happiest with Newt Gingrich.
Clinton had an strong but good tendency to trust and cooperate but he could not stop the attacks because his advisors were interventionists.
Anyway, me being an STJ and having such a round wide short face is part of why I am so worried about becoming a member of a ruling class. I dont want to continue to benefit from from the State because I don't want to ever hurt on a centralized scale. I mean, Bush was on drugs like I am. Just because some are psychiatrically approved does not make illegal ones worse. Drugs can slow down stupidity or speed it up and they definitely have costs. But evil will never be fixed or reduced by aggression and I think that I have an evil soul while also being an innocent potentially brown person.
Bush 43 very closely resembles George Washington (but neither could be democratically nationalist like Andrew Jackson; Bush and Washington were conservative nationalists like Lincoln).
Dubya's decisions were most like those of Polk (e.g., cut certain tax rates to increase revenues, create new depts, letting people you claim to represent get murdered, lie about it, and then murdering innocent brown people while not taking responsibility for it) and lead to disaster. Bush 41's father was psychologically a lot like Lincoln, but I am assuming that his father did more damage outside the Presidency while not being quite as evil as his son and probably not as evil as Lincoln was.
John Tyler, OTOH, was an STJ like the most authoritarian and evil presidents were, but he was a very good man and very civil looking. Grover cleveland was also an STJ but he was always fat, civil looking, and a good man. Coolidge was an ISTJ, but he was a good man. I know that Coolidge was good/civil because he was capable of giving up power, saying no to it, independently and because he was celtic/red noric/alpine. ESTJs FDR (who was always told what to do like Bush was) and Truman were evil for bombing the Japanese while not caring or at least not being aware that civilians were being killed (see Ralph Raico on Truman). I know I cannot be like John Tyler, Cleveland, or Coolidge because of all the prenatal T I have. People independently educated know that the State is hypertestosteronal (and thus evil and certainly not smart) because it fosters the dishonest and it will never nurture anyone dependent without hurting at least one other person. The Whiskey Tax, of course, was an instance of the State contributing to division when it claimed to support union. I am too much like the State as I am hypertestosteronal and that should explain why i want to be euthanized instead of getting operated on at any time in the future.
Extra thanks from me to the good people at AT.
Facebook
Twitter