• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Whitelisting as Wireless Security

Jimbo

Platinum Member
I have been doing this for a while but decided I should probably run it by people that probably know more than I do.

A few years ago I always had problems with the WiFi security on my router, when it was enabled, always dropping network connections. Sine all of the computers on my wireless network are always the same machines I just decided to create a white list for those MAC addresses, while I left the encryption turned off.

What I was curious about was if that was a bad idea, and if so, why.
 
Damn, and I thought I was so smart too!
How serious of a risk is it leaving it along. All I really care about is keeping the neighbors off my network.
 
if your neighbours are very incompetent it's fine; but you should really use some encryption.

wpa2! no excuses!
 
It would take a mildly experienced user about a total of 5-10 minutes to list all of your MAC addresses.

My college uses MAC filtering, so for a while I just grabbed a snapshot of the current addresses and spoof'd.

+1 WPA2, WPA if no v2 .. and at the very least WEP.
 
There was a problem years ago in the time of WEP.

Current WPA/WPA2 are not a problem.

Using only a MAC address is going away leaving your house open, and putting a sign please do not enter.

From the weakest to the strongest, Wireless security capacity is.
No Security
Switching Off SSID (same has No Security. SSID can be easily sniffed even if it is Off)
MAC Filtering______(Band Aid if nothing else is available, MAC number can be easily Spoofed).
WEP64____(Easy, to "Break" by knowledgeable people).
WEP128___(A little Harder, but "Hackable" too).
-------------------
The three above are Not considered safe.
Safe Starts here at WPA.
-------------------
WPA-PSK__(Very Hard to Break).
WPA-AES__(Not functionally Breakable)
WPA2____ (Not functionally Breakable).

Note 1: WPA-AES the the current entry level rendition of WPA2.

Note 2: If you use WinXP bellow SP3 and did not updated it, you would have to download the WPA2 patch from Microsoft. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/893357

The documentation of your Wireless devices (Wireless Router, and Wireless Computer's Card) should state the type of security that is available with your Wireless hardware.

All devices MUST be set to the same security level using the same pass phrase.
Therefore the security must be set according what ever is the best possible of one of the Wireless devices.

I.e. even if most of your system might be capable to be configured to the max. with WPA2, but one device is only capable to be configured to max . of WEP, to whole system must be configured to WEP.

If you need more good security and one device (like a Wireless card that can do WEP only) is holding better security for the whole Network, replace the device with a better one.

Setting Wireless Security - http://www.ezlan.net/Wireless_Security.html

The Core differences between WEP, WPA, and WPA2 - http://www.ezlan.net/wpa_wep.html
.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top