White House skewed drilling safety report to support drill ban

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,487
20,025
146
OOPS!

"Most transparent admin in history" my ass...

Report: White House altered drilling safety report
Published November 10, 2010

Associated Press

WASHINGTON – The Interior Department's inspector general says the White House edited a drilling safety report in a way that made it falsely appear that scientists and experts supported the idea of the administration's six-month ban on new drilling.

The inspector general says the editing changes resulted "in the implication that the moratorium recommendation had been peer reviewed." But it hadn't been. The scientists were only asked to review new safety measures for offshore drilling.

"There was no intent to mislead the public," said Kendra Barkoff, a spokeswoman for Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, who also recommended in the May 27 safety report that a moratorium be placed on deepwater oil and gas exploration. "The decision to impose a temporary moratorium on deepwater drilling was made by the secretary, following consultation with colleagues including the White House."

The Interior Department, after one of the reviewers complained about the inference, promptly issued an apology to the reviewers during a conference call, with a letter and personal meeting in June.

The inspector general's report, which was originally requested by Louisiana Sen. David Vitter and Rep. Steve Scalise in June, said the administration did not violate federal rules because the executive summary did not say the experts approved the recommendations and the department offered a formal apology and had publicly clarified the nature of the expert review.

But Louisiana Rep. Bill Cassidy, a Republican, said in a statement that the investigation proved "that the blanket drilling moratorium was driven by a politics and not by science."

"Candidate Obama promised that he would guided by science, not ideology," Cassidy said. Cassidy said if that were true thousands of jobs and billions in economic activity would have been preserved on the Gulf coast.

The Web site Politico was first to report the inspector general's
findings. The Associated Press on Wednesday obtained a copy of the report, which has not been publicly released.
 
Last edited:

JD50

Lifer
Sep 4, 2005
11,925
2,908
136
Can you add a link? Preferably from foxnews.com to annoy the "ZOMG FAUX NOISE" crowd.
 

IGBT

Lifer
Jul 16, 2001
17,976
141
106
time for a special prosecutor. This is only the tip of the iceberg o the obama's corruption and deceit and lies.
 

cganesh75

Elite Member | For Sale/Trade
Super Moderator
Oct 8, 2005
9,546
36
101
time for a special prosecutor. This is only the tip of the iceberg o the obama's corruption and deceit and lies.

yeh.. we can start this case right after we find those WMD in Iraq
 

sMiLeYz

Platinum Member
Feb 3, 2003
2,696
0
76
Evidence of falsification not found

“Both versions, however, revised and re-ordered the executive summary, placing the peer review language immediately following the moratorium recommendation causing the distinction between the secretary’s moratorium recommendation – which had not been peer-reviewed – and the recommendations contained in the 30-Day Report – which had been peer-reviewed – to become effectively lost.”

Black said he didn’t have any issues with the White House edit; he and his staffer both told the IG it never occurred to them that an objective reader would conclude that peer reviewers had supported the six-month moratorium.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1110/44921_Page2.html#ixzz14trgSH1v
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,156
55,707
136
"Effectively lost"

Yeah, no problem there...

No one said there was no problem, just that your headline was... hmm... 'falsified'. The report itself says that the experts the IG consulted all agreed that it was a misunderstanding, AND that the DOI's head guy for this report had no problems with the editing because he didn't view it as misleading.

Seriously, there are tons of horrible and legitimate transparency issues about Obama and yet again you guys feel the need to invent new, crappy ones.

It seems very strange to complain about a skewed report in a post where you skew the news article about the news report.
 

ericlp

Diamond Member
Dec 24, 2000
6,139
236
106
Haha! Uh oh! Obama is starting to look like a republican! Hey! that's a good thing right?????
 

IGBT

Lifer
Jul 16, 2001
17,976
141
106
Interior Department's inspector general says the White House edited a drilling safety report in a way that made it falsely appear that scientists and experts supported the idea of the administration's six-month ban on new drilling.
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
This is old news; Darwin owned me over it months ago. (What I get for EVER trusting and siding with the Messiah.) The Obama administration had the document peer reviewed by the National Academy of Engineering, THEN added its political slant to it.

Yup, clearly a mere misunderstanding.
 

IGBT

Lifer
Jul 16, 2001
17,976
141
106
your obama obviously intentionally lied to forward his retrograde agenda.
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
I think this is beyond agenda. The progressive agenda is no new energy, ever, and especially no new domestic oil. Obama relaxed that to allow deep water drilling (coincidentally by one of his biggest contributors, but in theory other, less enlightened companies would eventually have been allowed to participate too.) Granted, he blatantly lied to justify his ban, but at least he did try domestic oil, however briefly. This and his performance on the War on (Islamic) Terror makes me think he can move to the center just as Clinton did. Assuming that the Senate Democrats follow and the House Republicans perform like the Class of '94, this could be a very good thing, preventing the excesses of both parties.
 

CycloWizard

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
12,348
1
81
Well, I for one am glad that the role of the executive branch is to enforce laws rather than manage moratoriums. Otherwise, this would have been a big scandal. :colbert: