White House Readying Plans To Keep Party In Power; "The Republicans Are Praying For Another 9/11"

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Text

By Muriel Kane

Thom Hartmann began his program on Thursday by reading from a new Executive Order which allows the government to seize the assets of anyone who interferes with its Iraq policies.

He then introduced old-line conservative Paul Craig Roberts -- a former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under Reagan who has recently become known for his strong opposition to the Bush administration and the Iraq War -- by quoting the "strong words" which open Roberts' latest column: "Unless Congress immediately impeaches Bush and Cheney, a year from now the US could be a dictatorial police state at war with Iran."

"I don't actually think they're very strong," said Roberts of his words. "I get a lot of flak that they're understated and the situation is worse than I say. ... When Bush exercises this authority [under the new Executive Order] ... there's no check to it. It doesn't have to be ratified by Congress. The people who bear the brunt of these dictatorial police state actions have no recourse to the judiciary. So it really is a form of total, absolute, one-man rule. ... The American people don't really understand the danger that they face."

Roberts said that because of Bush's unpopularity, the Republicans face a total wipeout in 2008, and this may be why "the Democrats have not brought a halt to Bush's follies or the war, because they expect his unpopular policies to provide them with a landslide victory in next year's election."

However, Roberts emphasized, "the problem with this reasoning is that it assumes that Cheney and Rove and the Republicans are ignorant of these facts, or it assumes that they are content for the Republican Party to be destroyed after Bush has his fling." Roberts believes instead that Cheney and Rove intend to use a renewal of the War on Terror to rally the American people around the Republican Party. "Something's in the works," he said, adding that the Executive Orders need to create a police state are already in place.

"The administration figures themselves and prominent Republican propagandists ... are preparing us for another 9/11 event or series of events," Roberts continued. "Chertoff has predicted them. ... The National Intelligence Estimate is saying that al Qaeda has regrouped. ... You have to count on the fact that if al Qaeda's not going to do it, it's going to be orchestrated. ... The Republicans are praying for another 9/11."

Hartmann asked what we as the people can do if impeachment isn't about to happen. "If enough people were suspicious and alert, it would be harder for the administration to get away with it," Roberts replied. However, he added, "I don't think these wake-up calls are likely to be effective," pointing out the dominance of the mainstream media.

"Americans think their danger is terrorists," said Roberts. "They don't understand the terrorists cannot take away habeas corpus, the Bill of Rights, the Constitution. ... The terrorists are not anything like the threat that we face to the Bill of Rights and the Constitution from our own government in the name of fighting terrorism. Americans just aren't able to perceive that."

Roberts pointed out that it's old-line Republicans like himself, former Reagan associate deputy attorney general Bruce Fein, and Pat Buchanan who are the diehards in warning of the danger. "It's so obvious to people like us who have long been associated in the corridors of power," he said. "There's no belief in the people or anything like that. They have agendas. The people are in the way. The Constitution is in the way. ... Americans need to comprehend and look at how ruthless Cheney is. ... A person like that would do anything."

Roberts final suggestion was that, in the absence of a massive popular outcry, "the only constraints on what's going to happen will come from the federal bureaucracy and perhaps the military. They may have had enough. They may not go along with it."

The full audio of Thom Hartmann's interview with Paul Craig Roberts can be found here.

------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree with him completely. The White House seems too calm during this storm about Iraq, completely abandoning the cries of their own political party that their ship is sinking and it's dragging the party down with them. Americans seem to respond to one thing very well when it comes to the Republican party: fear. See the link in my signature for proof. Republicans believe that they can illicit a Pavlovian response from voters by pummeling the public with a constant state of fear. Now that "9/11" has lost its effectiveness as a rallying cry, the Republican party is patiently awaiting their new savior for the 2008 elections...they can't win it on their platform alone.

Chertoff's gut...the N.I.E. report...constant banter from the White House about the renewed strength of al-Qaeda and their desire to strike us at home...I hope you guys are ready for a bumpy ride as November 2008 approaches.

Two year old thread that has nothing to do with current events doesn't need to be bumped.

Anandtech Senior Moderator
Red Dawn
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,267
126
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
:tinfoil;

Considering that Bush violated FISA (but he wrote an executive order putting himself above the law), and that Bush has just said (again by executive order) that he can force the justice department to not comply with Congressional contempt efforts, and that the wording of another executive order allows Bush broad powers to take property without due process, we have no cause to be concerned, right?

You know I don't support Bush, but you also know I don't make this stuff up.
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Originally posted by: Hayabusa Rider
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
:tinfoil;

Considering that Bush violated FISA (but he wrote an executive order putting himself above the law), and that Bush has just said (again by executive order) that he can force the justice department to not comply with Congressional contempt efforts, and that the wording of another executive order allows Bush broad powers to take property without due process, we have no cause to be concerned, right?

You know I don't support Bush, but you also know I don't make this stuff up.

So even if you buy the tone and insinuation of your opinions above - it is still absurd to think Bush and/or the Republicans are conspiring to plan a terrorist event or to allow one to happen.
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
One person's opinion
You have to count on the fact that if al Qaeda's not going to do it, it's going to be orchestrated. ... The Republicans are praying for another 9/11."
Statements like above, fuel the tinfoil crowd.

Plus you are trying to tar an entire group of people with it. :(
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,267
126
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Hayabusa Rider
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
:tinfoil;

Considering that Bush violated FISA (but he wrote an executive order putting himself above the law), and that Bush has just said (again by executive order) that he can force the justice department to not comply with Congressional contempt efforts, and that the wording of another executive order allows Bush broad powers to take property without due process, we have no cause to be concerned, right?

You know I don't support Bush, but you also know I don't make this stuff up.

So even if you buy the tone and insinuation of your opinions above - it is still absurd to think Bush and/or the Republicans are conspiring to plan a terrorist event or to allow one to happen.

No, I don't think they would conspire to commit another 9/11, however I do believe that if another attack happens, broad sweeping changes brought by the President will circumvent the courts and Congress via executive order. It will be in "our best interests" of course, but kiss the Bill of Rights as we have come to understand them good bye.
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: Common Courtesy
One person's opinion
You have to count on the fact that if al Qaeda's not going to do it, it's going to be orchestrated. ... The Republicans are praying for another 9/11."
Statements like above, fuel the tinfoil crowd.

Plus you are trying to tar an entire group of people with it. :(

With all due respect that "entire group" has been trumpeting that we are "safer" becuase of them and they are the single reason there has been no attack since 9-11 and they blamed and still blame Clinton and the other group for 9-11 to begin with.

Should another attack happen on their watch that will blow all their blow out of the water.
 

alchemize

Lifer
Mar 24, 2000
11,486
0
0
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Common Courtesy
One person's opinion
You have to count on the fact that if al Qaeda's not going to do it, it's going to be orchestrated. ... The Republicans are praying for another 9/11."
Statements like above, fuel the tinfoil crowd.

Plus you are trying to tar an entire group of people with it. :(

With all due respect that "entire group" has been trumpeting that we are "safer" becuase of them and they are the single reason there has been no attack since 9-11 and they blamed and still blame Clinton and the other group for 9-11 to begin with.

Should another attack happen on their watch that will blow all their blow out of the water.

This coming from the person that was wishing for an Al Qaida attack on the New York financial district to "kill rich corporate thugs".
 

1EZduzit

Lifer
Feb 4, 2002
11,833
1
0
With scarcely a mention in the mainstream media, President Bush has ordered up a plan for responding to a catastrophic attack.

In a new National Security Presidential Directive, Bush lays out his plans for dealing with a ?catastrophic emergency.?
Under that plan, he entrusts himself with leading the entire federal government, not just the Executive Branch. And he gives himself the responsibility ?for ensuring constitutional government.?

He laid this all out in a document entitled "National Security Presidential Directive/NSPD 51" and "Homeland Security Presidential Directive/HSPD-20."
.
.
.
.
The document also contains ?classified Continuity Annexes.?

Bush Anoints Himself as the Insurer of Constitutional Government in Emergency

Add another Presidential directive to the "tinfoil".

 

palehorse

Lifer
Dec 21, 2005
11,521
0
76
umm, does anyone have any extra tinfoil with them? I ran out and my new shipment won't arrive until Monday.... DAMNIT!

:cookie:
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Originally posted by: alchemize
Thanks to JPeyton
You're welcome ;)

With CAD being back, I'm glad the tinfoil brigade is back at it. Nothing garners intelligent debate like posting "tinfoil" on any dissenting opinion. Tony Snow would be proud.
 

palehorse

Lifer
Dec 21, 2005
11,521
0
76
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: alchemize
Thanks to JPeyton
You're welcome ;)

With CAD being back, I'm glad the tinfoil brigade is back at it. Nothing garners intelligent debate like posting "tinfoil" on any dissenting opinion. Tony Snow would be proud.
This is not a "dissenting opinion." This is a ridiculous conspiracy theory, plain and simple.
 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
Ridiculous conspiracy theory or not, its quite clear the congressional leadership and the executive branch are headed for a fight. And it seems there is no tactic GWB&co will not use to keep his grip on power.

Maybe congress and the executive will preen and strut for their respective fans until GWB's term expires, but I am pretty sure that soon an issue will develop where the respective sides
will engage in an open battle.
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
34,781
8,884
136
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
:tinfoil;

:tinfoil;

Speaking of which, if we're busy fighting over the entire concept of reality, how much longer can such a grievous breach remain non-violent? Dems keep telling us Republicans caused 9-11, and now tell us we would cause another to keep power. This sort of hatred and vitriol doesn?t boil forever without spilling over.

*edit typo
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Common Courtesy
One person's opinion
You have to count on the fact that if al Qaeda's not going to do it, it's going to be orchestrated. ... The Republicans are praying for another 9/11."
Statements like above, fuel the tinfoil crowd.

Plus you are trying to tar an entire group of people with it. :(

With all due respect that "entire group" has been trumpeting that we are "safer" becuase of them and they are the single reason there has been no attack since 9-11 and they blamed and still blame Clinton and the other group for 9-11 to begin with.

Should another attack happen on their watch that will blow all their blow out of the water.

This coming from the person that was wishing for an Al Qaida attack on the New York financial district to "kill rich corporate thugs".

Wow. I never said such a thing.

If ever the "Enemy Combatant under the Patriot Act" should be evoked should be now for anyone saying such a thing.

The Mods should turn you in to the authorities immediately.
 

alchemize

Lifer
Mar 24, 2000
11,486
0
0
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Common Courtesy
One person's opinion
You have to count on the fact that if al Qaeda's not going to do it, it's going to be orchestrated. ... The Republicans are praying for another 9/11."
Statements like above, fuel the tinfoil crowd.

Plus you are trying to tar an entire group of people with it. :(

With all due respect that "entire group" has been trumpeting that we are "safer" becuase of them and they are the single reason there has been no attack since 9-11 and they blamed and still blame Clinton and the other group for 9-11 to begin with.

Should another attack happen on their watch that will blow all their blow out of the water.

This coming from the person that was wishing for an Al Qaida attack on the New York financial district to "kill rich corporate thugs".

Wow. I never said such a thing.

If ever the "Enemy Combatant under the Patriot Act" should be evoked should be now for anyone saying such a thing.

The Mods should turn you in to the authorities immediately.

You suffering from some selective amnesia. It was in my list of "dumbest leftie P&N quotes". Don't make me drag it out and embarrass you.
 

alchemize

Lifer
Mar 24, 2000
11,486
0
0
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Common Courtesy
One person's opinion
You have to count on the fact that if al Qaeda's not going to do it, it's going to be orchestrated. ... The Republicans are praying for another 9/11."
Statements like above, fuel the tinfoil crowd.

Plus you are trying to tar an entire group of people with it. :(

With all due respect that "entire group" has been trumpeting that we are "safer" becuase of them and they are the single reason there has been no attack since 9-11 and they blamed and still blame Clinton and the other group for 9-11 to begin with.

Should another attack happen on their watch that will blow all their blow out of the water.

This coming from the person that was wishing for an Al Qaida attack on the New York financial district to "kill rich corporate thugs".

Wow. I never said such a thing.

If ever the "Enemy Combatant under the Patriot Act" should be evoked should be now for anyone saying such a thing.

The Mods should turn you in to the authorities immediately.

Fuck it - you need some embarrassing.
Link

Originally posted by: dmcowen674
quote:
Originally posted by: Buck_Naked
ABC News link



Al Qaeda Plotting to Attack New York City Corporations

The sources tell ABC News that Wall Street firms may be among the targeted U.S. corporations based in New York City. Which corporations or how many may be targeted has not been revealed.
================================

If it's a corrupt Corp (which is the majority these days) they'd be doing us a favor. If there is a Haliburton Office in NY, please target then first.
 

Gaard

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
8,911
1
0
How are you finding all this stuff, Alchy, with no search? You got everything saved? How about your 'Coup de grâce' (the spittle thread with Bob)...got that one?
 

Sinsear

Diamond Member
Jan 13, 2007
6,439
80
91
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Common Courtesy
One person's opinion
You have to count on the fact that if al Qaeda's not going to do it, it's going to be orchestrated. ... The Republicans are praying for another 9/11."
Statements like above, fuel the tinfoil crowd.

Plus you are trying to tar an entire group of people with it. :(

With all due respect that "entire group" has been trumpeting that we are "safer" becuase of them and they are the single reason there has been no attack since 9-11 and they blamed and still blame Clinton and the other group for 9-11 to begin with.

Should another attack happen on their watch that will blow all their blow out of the water.

This coming from the person that was wishing for an Al Qaida attack on the New York financial district to "kill rich corporate thugs".

Wow. I never said such a thing.

If ever the "Enemy Combatant under the Patriot Act" should be evoked should be now for anyone saying such a thing.

The Mods should turn you in to the authorities immediately.

Fuck it - you need some embarrassing.
Link

Originally posted by: dmcowen674
quote:
Originally posted by: Buck_Naked
ABC News link



Al Qaeda Plotting to Attack New York City Corporations

The sources tell ABC News that Wall Street firms may be among the targeted U.S. corporations based in New York City. Which corporations or how many may be targeted has not been revealed.
================================

If it's a corrupt Corp (which is the majority these days) they'd be doing us a favor. If there is a Haliburton Office in NY, please target then first.


pwnage :laugh:
 

alchemize

Lifer
Mar 24, 2000
11,486
0
0
Originally posted by: Gaard
How are you finding all this stuff, Alchy, with no search? You got everything saved? How about your 'Coup de grâce' (the spittle thread with Bob)...got that one?
Search has been working pretty good for me lately. Found this one no problem once I remembered the "keyword". Although I don't see the Mod edit anymore? Ah the good old days.

Link
 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
Ah the good ole days back in 10/2003---when only a few dared question the war in Iraq, GWB had a 90% approval rating, and the self evident genius of Rumsfeld ruled the day. The sheer nostalgia is enough to get me puking with passion.