Originally posted by: AEB
i said bush should have looked into it before he opened his mouth maybe not on this thread but one of them, but bush didnt find out the intellegence was faulty untill he already spouted it.
Second Hans blix DID say he beleived iraq still had WMD, you missed it because it was while the war was going on.
Third the media is never bush friendly so its nothing new, i dont base it on the fact they bash bush. I dont like him as a president too much because he plays politics, but i do know he is better than gore.
I am also aware that the conservatives are moving to "war of liberation" but im not. I beleive there were WMD that just need to be found it hasnt been that long and there are still saddam loyalists in the country who could be hiding them. I however am an independant thinker and am not tied down to any affiliation.
That aside i think saddam was a threat if he was able to start a nuclear arms program i mean look at north korea. in addition he did fund terrorist ogrinizations. The US recently arrested a "religious leader" with hundreds of thousand of dollars in cash, papers talking about terrorist activites and a shrine devoted to saddam.
In the case we don't find WMD, which i deem unlikely at best, i will personally feel safer. all 9/11 took was funding.
EDIT: however i think its inconclusive to say weather or not the presient quoted flimsy intellegence, or if he knowlingy used false intellegence. that said col hunt says what needs to be done
QUOTE:
--
"I think there are some people that need to be fired -- starting with the [Director of Central Intelligence George] Tenet. This is bad. When they're blaming him publicly, and that's unheard of ... it can't be glossed over. The bureaucracy has got to knock this off. It can't happen anymore," he said.
---
from Here
In other words Bush lied.
