Which would you rather be?

[jhu]

Loser with successful children or successful with loser children?

 

[IronWing]

Where's the option for successfully losing your children?

 

[busydude]

Neither.

 

[KeithTalent]

Successful with no children.

KT

 

[Stuxnet]

I think any good parent would give anything of themselves so their child can succeed / be happy.

 

[blackdogdeek]

as a parent, it is my sole endeavor to ensure that my children can responsibly, independently, compassionately and successfully achieve, or, at the very least, strive for, that which makes them happy, regardless of what my own standing is.

but, if my children do indeed reach this level success, then, at the very least, i don't see how i could be considered a total loser.

 

[HAL9000]

I'd rather be successful, but when I have children my priorities will change I imagine.

 

[jhu]

as a parent, it is my sole endeavor to ensure that my children can responsibly, independently, compassionately and successfully achieve, or, at the very least, strive for, that which makes them happy, regardless of what my own standing is.

but, if my children do indeed reach this level success, then, at the very least, i don't see how i could be considered a total loser.

What if they're successful despite how much of a loser you are?

 

[blackdogdeek]

What if they're successful despite how much of a loser you are?

as long as they are successful, it doesn't matter.

 

[slayer202]

Successful with no children.

KT

indeed

 

[shortylickens]

No children.
Big penis.
Hot wife.
And a nice little cabin on the lake.

 

[Pardus]

C. Don't give a crap.

 

[IronWing]

No children.
Big penis.
Hot wife.
And a nice little cabin on the lake.

Shorty IRL:
Big wife
No penis
Hot cabin
And nice little children in the lake.

 

[Fritzo]

Successful with no children. You can always disown the bums.

 

[DrPizza]

That's a really tough one - a good parent is willing to make sacrifices for their children. No good parent wants their children to end up as losers. Thus, I think I'd lean in that direction.

I'm fortunate that I don't have to worry about it. Both kids have been successful; ditto my wife and myself.

 

[nickbits]

"Successful with no children" would be my first option but I picked "Successful with loser children" since you can toss 'em out at 18 and then you essentially have my first choice.

 

[dave_the_nerd]

Well, my dad is successful with loser kids, so the only option I realistically have is to be a loser and have successful kids.

Simple.

 

[Saint Nick]

Shorty IRL:
No Wife
Short penis
No cabin
Nothing

Fixed.

 

[BoberFett]

If you're a loser and your children are successful, that's your problem.

If you're successful and your children are losers, that's everybody's problem.

 

[pcgeek11]

If you have successful children, you were successful period.

 

[nickbits]

If you have successful children, you were successful period.

Success is measured in $.

 

[SandEagle]

as a parent, it is my sole endeavor to ensure that my children can responsibly, independently, compassionately and successfully achieve, or, at the very least, strive for, that which makes them happy, regardless of what my own standing is.

but, if my children do indeed reach this level success, then, at the very least, i don't see how i could be considered a total loser.

that's horseshit. what if your kid says being a janitor and cleaning manure makes him happy. u ok with that?

 

[MotionMan]

Loser with successful children

This is what I will be looked at as anyway.



MotionMan

 

[pcgeek11]

Success is measured in $.

No. It is not. If that is how You measure success then you are already a loser.

 

[shortylickens]

No. It is not. If that is how You measure success then you are already a loser.

Ima loser and I dont measure success that way.

YOU FAIL!!