- Nov 26, 2005
- 15,194
- 403
- 126
So, i recently put together a Quad Q9300, which I am going to keep. The memory I purchased DDR3 1333 started to show errors (no overclocking & at stock speeds) and so, I am sending them back for a refund and looking at faster options.
I am thinking about the new Cell Shock 1866 memory. Currently they're priced seriously high, 394$ totally stupid price... The upgrade and replacement of my AMD platform came out to 384$ This AMD machine use to be my gaming platform and is still good under my configuration in sig. I'd imagine if i was using a higher res, larger screen, it would suffer harder fps hits. If I were to upgrade, it'd be: e7200, P5K- e P35, & 4G or PC 800 or above.
Does this AMD platform still hold a good resale on the market? I also have 2Gb of DDR 400 2.2.2.5
Would the e7200 platform be better or be a lateral move? uses: gaming UT3, COD4, Crysis, BF2, Red Orchestra and daily uses and would the e7200 consume less power/$$$ over the AMD?
Thanks for your time
I am thinking about the new Cell Shock 1866 memory. Currently they're priced seriously high, 394$ totally stupid price... The upgrade and replacement of my AMD platform came out to 384$ This AMD machine use to be my gaming platform and is still good under my configuration in sig. I'd imagine if i was using a higher res, larger screen, it would suffer harder fps hits. If I were to upgrade, it'd be: e7200, P5K- e P35, & 4G or PC 800 or above.
Does this AMD platform still hold a good resale on the market? I also have 2Gb of DDR 400 2.2.2.5
Would the e7200 platform be better or be a lateral move? uses: gaming UT3, COD4, Crysis, BF2, Red Orchestra and daily uses and would the e7200 consume less power/$$$ over the AMD?
Thanks for your time
