• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Which windows client for F@H is faster?

I

InlineFive

Diamond Member
I am wondering about this, from SETI@Home I am leaning towards the CLI client. SETI@Home doesn't seem to serve a real purpose and I'm not interested in some of the other projects.

Thanks!

-Por
 
Most people agree the command line client, here, is just a few percent faster than the graphical client, get it here.
I s'pose it comes down to whether you would like to view graphics of the protiens doing their thing, or a more spartan look with the command line version.
The command line client can be run as a service if need be, and then you never even have to look at anything after its configured.
rolleye.gif

The old cliche, It's all good! certainly applies. Whichever client, or project for that matter, that you choose will be much appreciated.
 
The command line client is faster and uses less RAM. I switched from the GUI to command line and it's a bit faster. Also, forcing SSE seems to be faster than 3D Now on my 2500+ @ 2.2.
 
Originally posted by: MonkeyDriveExpress
The command line client is faster and uses less RAM. I switched from the GUI to command line and it's a bit faster. Also, forcing SSE seems to be faster than 3D Now on my 2500+ @ 2.2.
Click to expand...

Can you force SSE/3DNow! with graphical? I'm having a hard time figuring out the configuration "wizard" when you first start the F@H CLI...
 
Try editing the shortcut and adding the -forceSSE flag. Don't know if it works though. This may help you out. Remember to join TeAm 198!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top