- Oct 1, 2004
- 3,290
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: So
And I prefer 16:9
Originally posted by: bluewall21
1.85 because it fills my 16:9 screen more than 2:35. Black bars FTL.
I think he meant 1.85:1.Originally posted by: So
1:85...that's ridiculous.
Originally posted by: shortylickens
I think he meant 1.85:1.Originally posted by: So
1:85...that's ridiculous.
Which is bullsh1t anyway, because you can only have integers in a ratio.
But its already been established that the industry can make up whatever BS they want and get away with it.
Just like the 8 million to one contrast ratios and 50 thousand lumins we see on monitor specifications.
EDIT: I like 16:9. Its the square of 4:3 and I like that.![]()
