Jimzz
Diamond Member
- Oct 23, 2012
- 4,399
- 190
- 106
Yet, I've rarely seen JD Powers reliability data stray far from what CR presents, despite the diatribe of opinion presented by your link.
If anything, with the readers being better educated and wealthier, their cars should be treated better with better and more frequent service.
And while Audi among other brands scurry up and down the overall ratings board, ever consider why this may be? The author of that opinion piece didn't. Could it be that a particularly troublesome model or year is dropped off the end when the new year is added, thereby enhancing the reliability rating? Naaa....that certainly couldn't enter into that, could it?
(Hint: That's how car lines make gains in reliability....the less reliable ones become old enough to ignore while the newer ones are becoming more reliable, and the chart reflects it....and that other makers are having problems. Naaa.....that couldn't possibly be a factor.....that well researched article you linked doesn't mention that, so it couldn't be.)
And did you ever consider that the buyers of the Toyota version of the Prism may have been more attentive to maintenance than the Chevy buyers, which I fully expect to be a huge reason that the Toytoas were "more reliable" than the Chevy version.
Did you even look at audi in 2010 and 2011, they did not have any major changes. 15 models in 2010 and 15 in 2011 all the same, yet they "reliability' number where hugly different.
And I guess you agree then CR should be ignored if they can't tell the difference between the reliability of 2 of the same cars other than its owners then they are not rating cars but owners? Your words.
Its at best a "This is what our paying members think...." then it is about the cars.
Consumer Reports reliability ratings for cars and trucks: are they reliable?
http://www.allpar.com/cr.html
