- Sep 26, 2000
- 28,559
- 4
- 0
So I am upgrading my third computer and have an MSI k9vgm-v mobo (Via k8m890 chipset) socket am2.
I never play games, and I will use the onboard video. I will run WinXP pro.
I use the computer for some video editing, not much. Otherwise web surfing and email. No overclocking.
Here is the cpu compatibility list:
http://global.msi.com.tw/index...od_no=260&maincat_no=1
I am looking at the 65nm Amd cpu's.
My two possibilites are:
Athlon 64 x2 2.7 ghz with 2x512 cache 65 watt cpu for 77.00
Athlon x2 4450e 2.3 mb with 1 mb cache 45w cpu for 77.00
I am assuming the different ways the cache are listed means the 2x512 means each 512 is allocated to one core, and that the 1mb cache can be fully utilized by either core if free.
Is the additional mhz or the different cache more important? Which one would you recommend?
Thanks
I never play games, and I will use the onboard video. I will run WinXP pro.
I use the computer for some video editing, not much. Otherwise web surfing and email. No overclocking.
Here is the cpu compatibility list:
http://global.msi.com.tw/index...od_no=260&maincat_no=1
I am looking at the 65nm Amd cpu's.
My two possibilites are:
Athlon 64 x2 2.7 ghz with 2x512 cache 65 watt cpu for 77.00
Athlon x2 4450e 2.3 mb with 1 mb cache 45w cpu for 77.00
I am assuming the different ways the cache are listed means the 2x512 means each 512 is allocated to one core, and that the 1mb cache can be fully utilized by either core if free.
Is the additional mhz or the different cache more important? Which one would you recommend?
Thanks