Which OS would an EVIL PERSON PREFER or USE

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
C

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Equally evil or equally safe.

:confused:

Ok...edit...uh...my vote for most ridiculous, "wtf-are-you-talking-about-Willis" poll....ever!
 
P

PlatinumGold

Lifer
Aug 11, 2000
23,168
0
71
i think some people are JUST not getting it.

Me,
rolleye.gif


Not which OS is evil, but Which OS would an EVIL PERSON PREFER or USE.
 
A

Amorphus

Diamond Member
Mar 31, 2003
5,561
1
0
Originally posted by: edro13
I hate WinXP's "Find" crap...
Click to expand...

Speak it, brutha! When I click on "Search", I just want the SEARCH dialogue to come up. why do I have to choose what I want to find on a redundant and superfluous list, when I can just SPECIFY what I want to search for? stupid user-friendly stuff.

and Win2k would be the more evil one, I think. has a better rep.

however, I'd have WinXP box in a closet, with VNC... ;)
 
D

Descartes

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
13,968
2
0
Originally posted by: Amorphus
Originally posted by: edro13
I hate WinXP's "Find" crap...
Click to expand...

Speak it, brutha! When I click on "Search", I just want the SEARCH dialogue to come up. why do I have to choose what I want to find on a redundant and superfluous list, when I can just SPECIFY what I want to search for? stupid user-friendly stuff.

and Win2k would be the more evil one, I think. has a better rep.

however, I'd have WinXP box in a closet, with VNC... ;)
Click to expand...

Because everyone complained about Windows making it difficult to find things. Microsoft really can't win either way; they're admonished by the 10% who don't feel the 90% need to be accommodated. Everyone criticized Windows for not being "secure by default", now you get annoying "Are you sure you're really sure?" dialogs everytime you make any change to the OS that might result in an additional 0.000001% of vulnerability.

Oh, and just disable the user-friendly stuff and go back to "classic."
 
E

EyeMWing

Banned
Jun 13, 2003
15,670
1
0
Originally posted by: Bootprint
MS-DOS with Windows Ver 2.0 (I do have disks for Windows v2)
Click to expand...

I have a box running Win2.01.
And 1.01.
And 1.02.
And 3.1.
And 3.11.
And 95.

It is the ONLY true evil computer on earth. I've been attempting to get a P2 to run the 1/2/3 versions, so I can create the second version of it - running everything from 1.01 to Win2k3 Server Enterprise.

Speaking as an evil person, between those two choices - the most evil one of the two is Win2k. True evil minds have no time for such superfluous crap as is included in WinXP, but require the security holes to leak false information about their plans.
 
Snapster

Snapster

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2001
3,916
0
0
Originally posted by: Amorphus
Originally posted by: edro13
I hate WinXP's "Find" crap...
Click to expand...

Speak it, brutha! When I click on "Search", I just want the SEARCH dialogue to come up. why do I have to choose what I want to find on a redundant and superfluous list, when I can just SPECIFY what I want to search for? stupid user-friendly stuff.

and Win2k would be the more evil one, I think. has a better rep.

however, I'd have WinXP box in a closet, with VNC... ;)
Click to expand...

Despite the fact you can disable it, and the crappy 'helper'
 
G

GermyBoy

Banned
Jun 5, 2001
3,524
0
0
Originally posted by: Anubis
linux. add that
Click to expand...

No no, only nerds who don't get any sex use linux.

People who use Win2k are evil because to be evil, you need stability in an OS.
 
N

n0cmonkey

Elite Member
Jun 10, 2001
42,936
1
0
Originally posted by: GermyBoy
Originally posted by: Anubis
linux. add that
Click to expand...

No no, only nerds who don't get any sex use linux.

People who use Win2k are evil because to be evil, you need stability in an OS.
Click to expand...

Win2k? Is that why their plots are always foiled?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom