Which one would you choose?

Aug 23, 2000
15,509
1
81
none of the above.
I can't understand why anyone would want a 3x core CPU. The only reason they have 3x cores is because their yields in getting functional quads was so bad they couldn't just throw out all those chips. In essence, buying a 3x core CPU is buying defective parts.
 

heymrdj

Diamond Member
May 28, 2007
3,999
63
91
Originally posted by: JeffreyLebowski
none of the above.
I can't understand why anyone would want a 3x core CPU. The only reason they have 3x cores is because their yields in getting functional quads was so bad they couldn't just throw out all those chips. In essence, buying a 3x core CPU is buying defective parts.

This. When I built my gf's alot of people said buy into the "value" of the tri-core phenoms. I just went all out for the 9950 Quad Black. That thing purrs oh so sweet to video encoding. Also remember that alot of things are written to scale in 2CPU architectures (aka 2,4,6,8 cores), and won't use the 3rd core very well. It's just not worth it.
 

Knavish

Senior member
May 17, 2002
910
3
81
Originally posted by: JeffreyLebowski
none of the above.
I can't understand why anyone would want a 3x core CPU. The only reason they have 3x cores is because their yields in getting functional quads was so bad they couldn't just throw out all those chips. In essence, buying a 3x core CPU is buying defective parts.

Both AMD and Intel have been doing binning like this for years to determine chip clock speed. Does that mean that you're buying a defective part if you don't get the fastest Extreme Edition available?
 

heymrdj

Diamond Member
May 28, 2007
3,999
63
91
Originally posted by: Knavish
Originally posted by: JeffreyLebowski
none of the above.
I can't understand why anyone would want a 3x core CPU. The only reason they have 3x cores is because their yields in getting functional quads was so bad they couldn't just throw out all those chips. In essence, buying a 3x core CPU is buying defective parts.

Both AMD and Intel have been doing binning like this for years to determine chip clock speed. Does that mean that you're buying a defective part if you don't get the fastest Extreme Edition available?

There's a difference between a part getting lowered because it can't meet the high speeds, and a chip who's part is *completely* defective.
 

IlllI

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2002
4,929
11
81
they sell them at cheaper prices. for people who dont need it for anything but general tasks they might be drawn to the lower priced part.

 

corkyg

Elite Member | Peripherals
Super Moderator
Mar 4, 2000
27,370
240
106
None of the above. I am biased about laptop CPUs - never AMD!~