Which of these sentences is proper grammar?

rayray2

Senior member
Sep 12, 2002
871
0
76
Jimmy, (who is currently out of a job), nefs on AT all of the time.

Jimmy (who is currently out of a job), nefs on AT all of the time.

Does putting the comma after the parenthesis eliminate the need to put it after the name as well?
 

jagec

Lifer
Apr 30, 2004
24,442
6
81
Originally posted by: rayray2
Jimmy, (who is currently out of a job), nefs on AT all of the time.

Jimmy (who is currently out of a job), nefs on AT all of the time.

Does putting the comma after the parenthesis eliminate the need to put it after the name as well?

the second one is MORE grammatically correct, but why not just use the first and eliminate the parenthesis?
 

LtPage1

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2004
6,311
2
0
Originally posted by: jagec
Originally posted by: rayray2
Jimmy, (who is currently out of a job), nefs on AT all of the time.

Jimmy (who is currently out of a job), nefs on AT all of the time.

Does putting the comma after the parenthesis eliminate the need to put it after the name as well?

the second one is MORE grammatically correct, but why not just use the first and eliminate the parenthesis?

:thumbsup:
 

NikPreviousAcct

No Lifer
Aug 15, 2000
52,763
1
0
Well, you have to determine whether the bit in parentheses is necessary for clarification on which Jimmy you're talking about. If Jimmy is the only Jimmy in the story, then clarification on which Jimmy being referred to is not needed and, therefore, needs to be surrounded by commas. If there is more than one Jimmy and the bit in parentheses is required to define which one is being referred to, no commas are used.

Parentheses should not be used in that phrase at all.
 

maziwanka

Lifer
Jul 4, 2000
10,415
1
0
Originally posted by: jagec
Originally posted by: rayray2
Jimmy, (who is currently out of a job), nefs on AT all of the time.

Jimmy (who is currently out of a job), nefs on AT all of the time.

Does putting the comma after the parenthesis eliminate the need to put it after the name as well?

the second one is MORE grammatically correct, but why not just use the first and eliminate the parenthesis?

boo yah
 

NikPreviousAcct

No Lifer
Aug 15, 2000
52,763
1
0
Originally posted by: rayray2
The parenthesis have to be there in the sentence I'm typing. The sentence I used as an example was bad.

How about this one?

Anandtech, (www.anandtech.com), is a great site!

Anandtech (www.anandtech.com), is a great site!

In this case, parentheses are required. Your second example, with the comma after Anandtech missing, is the correct verbage.

<edit>

Wait, nevermind! I'm wrong. There should be no commas in that at all.
 

TheNinja

Lifer
Jan 22, 2003
12,207
1
0
Originally posted by: rayray2
Jimmy, (who is currently out of a job), nefs on AT all of the time.

Jimmy (who is currently out of a job), nefs on AT all of the time.

Does putting the comma after the parenthesis eliminate the need to put it after the name as well?

Jimmy, who is currently out of a job, nefs on AT all of the time.
OR
Jimmy (who is currently out of a job) nefs on AT all of the time.
First one is better though in this case.


Anandtech, www.anandtech.com, is a great site!
OR
Anandtech (www.anandtech.com) is a great site!
Second one is better in this case.
 

rayray2

Senior member
Sep 12, 2002
871
0
76
Okay let's try this one last time.

ABC Company, (www.abc.com), a leading software company, has aquired your business.

ABC Company (www.abc.com), a leading software company, has aquired your business.

Comma after the company name or not?
 

jagec

Lifer
Apr 30, 2004
24,442
6
81
Originally posted by: rayray2
Okay let's try this one last time.

ABC Company, (www.abc.com), a leading software company, has aquired your business.

ABC Company (www.abc.com), a leading software company, has aquired your business.

Comma after the company name or not?

the second one.

I know what you're getting at, and the answer is that you DON'T ever put commas before AND after parenthesis.
 

Dubb

Platinum Member
Mar 25, 2003
2,495
0
0
Originally posted by: rayray2
Okay let's try this one last time.

ABC Company, (www.abc.com), a leading software company, has aquired your business.

ABC Company (www.abc.com), a leading software company, has aquired your business.

Comma after the company name or not?



the second one...try to imagine how it would read without the bit in parentheses

ABC Company,, a leading software company, has aquired your business.

or

ABC Company, a leading software company, has aquired your business.
 

NikPreviousAcct

No Lifer
Aug 15, 2000
52,763
1
0
Originally posted by: WarDemon666
semicolons are your friend.

my teacher always says that when people make comma splices

Semicolons are for conjoining two like-typic sentences, not clarifying a subject with a small idea within the same sentence.
 

WarDemon666

Platinum Member
Nov 28, 2000
2,224
0
0
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: WarDemon666
semicolons are your friend.

my teacher always says that when people make comma splices

Semicolons are for conjoining two like-typic sentences, not clarifying a subject with a small idea within the same sentence.

shh. i know that. im just SAYYYINGGG : my teacher always says that when people make comma splices

:)
 

NikPreviousAcct

No Lifer
Aug 15, 2000
52,763
1
0
Originally posted by: WarDemon666
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: WarDemon666
semicolons are your friend.

my teacher always says that when people make comma splices

Semicolons are for conjoining two like-typic sentences, not clarifying a subject with a small idea within the same sentence.

shh. i know that. im just SAYYYINGGG : my teacher always says that when people make comma splices

:)

:p
 

jjones

Lifer
Oct 9, 2001
15,424
2
0
Originally posted by: Dubb
Originally posted by: rayray2
Okay let's try this one last time.

ABC Company, (www.abc.com), a leading software company, has aquired your business.

ABC Company (www.abc.com), a leading software company, has aquired your business.

Comma after the company name or not?



the second one...try to imagine how it would read without the bit in parentheses

ABC Company,, a leading software company, has aquired your business.

or

ABC Company, a leading software company, has aquired your business.
Good example. Normally when using parentheses you should punctuate as if that part did not exist in the sentence at all.

 

Mill

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
28,558
3
81
Originally posted by: rayray2
Jimmy, (who is currently out of a job), nefs on AT all of the time.

Jimmy (who is currently out of a job), nefs on AT all of the time.

Does putting the comma after the parenthesis eliminate the need to put it after the name as well?


Jimmy -- who is currently out of a job -- nefs on AT all of the time.
 

NikPreviousAcct

No Lifer
Aug 15, 2000
52,763
1
0
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: rayray2
Jimmy, (who is currently out of a job), nefs on AT all of the time.

Jimmy (who is currently out of a job), nefs on AT all of the time.

Does putting the comma after the parenthesis eliminate the need to put it after the name as well?


Jimmy -- who is currently out of a job -- nefs on AT all of the time.

hahaha

You're funny, Mill.

err... :confused:
 

Mill

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
28,558
3
81
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: rayray2
Jimmy, (who is currently out of a job), nefs on AT all of the time.

Jimmy (who is currently out of a job), nefs on AT all of the time.

Does putting the comma after the parenthesis eliminate the need to put it after the name as well?


Jimmy -- who is currently out of a job -- nefs on AT all of the time.

hahaha

You're funny, Mill.

err... :confused:

You are saying that isn't correct?