Which NAS best provides for my simple needs

theLuggage

Junior Member
Dec 9, 2013
2
0
0
Hi,
I'm a complete newb when it comes to NAS, so I'm hoping you smart people can help me out.

I'd like to get a NAS to hold my ripped DVD and Blu-ray movie collection, my mp3s and to be a destination for my backups.

I have a separate Windows Media Center HTPC box (Win 7) with a Ceton card for recording cable TV. And I use MyMovies along with Virtual CloneDrive (to mount my Blu-ray iso files) to play my movies. (I rip my blu-rays to iso because I actually like the disc menus and all the extras that come on the disc. I want the viewing experience to be as if I put the physical disc into a Blu-ray player.)

I've run out of disc space in my HTPC and am looking for something that I can easily add storage to. I imagine I need about 9TB of storage, but would like the flexibility to add more as my needs change.

I've looked at a Synology DS1513+, but I'm wondering if it's overkill for my needs. And I'm not sure if it would let me map a drive from my HTPC to where I store my iso files on the NAS and use Virtual CloneDrive to mount the iso. Basically, I want to do the same thing I do with my internal drive, but with a mapped drive instead. Will that work on a NAS? I am using a wired connection, not WiFi.

I want something simple to use, since I don't know a whole lot about networking and RAID, etc.

Any advice is most appreciated.
 

PliotronX

Diamond Member
Oct 17, 1999
8,883
107
106
Yup, you can mount ISO's from mounted shares. I'm all about building, my favorite chassis at the moment is this LianLi. Full x86 possibilities with a BluRay burner :D
 

smitbret

Diamond Member
Jul 27, 2006
3,382
17
81
Did you build your HTPC? If so, just build a NAS box. Put WHS 2011 on it for $50 and pat yourself on the back for saving some cash. You don't need a high powered system, the cheapest Richland core or Atom processor will do fine with 4GB of memory.

Otherwise, the least expensive NAS from a reliable name will do what you want, Synology's, Qnap, etc.
 

scoob8000

Member
Dec 20, 2004
28
0
0
My vote goes to anything Synology. I've been running a DS109 for years with 1tb internal, and two usb drives hanging off it. I've been tempted to get a 2 bay model when they're on sale, but it's not that big of an issue.
 

theLuggage

Junior Member
Dec 9, 2013
2
0
0
Thanks, everyone, for your suggestions. I appreciate it. I think I'll go for the Synology. How often do they go on sale?
 

Olivas

Member
Jul 1, 2009
91
0
61
Amazon had the DS1513+ for $750 during black friday week, down from the regular $800. Picked one up myself, love it.
 

wjgollatz

Senior member
Oct 1, 2004
372
0
0
I have a simple need too.

I have never done networking before, and I like the idea of a NAS, because I hope I could set something easy up for my parents to use on a computer I plan to put together for them.

Can a NAS serve as an offsite backup? Is it complicated for someone to backup onto an offsite NAS? And could a family member, with his Apple Mac, backup onto a Synology at my location, with my Win operating system on my PC, and possibly share space with any backups I might do?

How does the backup software in the Synology fare? I am getting ready to move from Acronis to Shadow Protect. And the initial cost of even a one bay Synology reduces the overall cost if one does not need to buy 3rd party back-up software. Can the Synology backup images, and do incremental and differential backups and possibly do hardware independent restoration like the Shadow Protect does? Can the Synology backup software automate redundant backups? I need to be able to quickly restore an OS. I had a failure, and thank god it wasn't when I needed to upload monthly tax info to the IRS and state. (I am also looking at a RAID setup for a small business I run, I can not risk loosing data anymore, and the RAID would automate a redundant backup).

I am getting ready to embark on a massive (for me) media scanning project. Has the Synology thumbnail creation improved (from what I am reading, it is excruciatingly slow). Can other applications replace it?
 
Last edited: