Well what i was thinking was that the amount of money I would spend on a top of the line processor ($250+) I could instead get two slightly slower processers with a significantly greater combined speed for about the same price... but it doesn't seem to look that way what with my limitations in options I now see. So some might ask why do I have a need for this - I really don't but I just wanted the best bang for my buck (budget of about $1200 for mobo, case, cpu, power supply, fan, NIC, sound board, CDR-W/DVD-RW - I already have the monitor, keyboard, mouse).
So with the current mobo's, I know they support the latest cpu's but a year or two from now will the support whatever is out at that time (ie. popping out the old cpu and putting a new one in)?
RAID 5 doesn't look that appealing then either if it's going to cost a bunch to do it. I think it would be better if I just purchased a DVD-RW drive instead and went with a mirroring (RAID 1) solution... any ideas on how would a RAID 0+1 solution benefit (or not) me if I used two 120GB drives?
EDIT: I just realized that 0+1 RAID is basically TWO (RAID 1) mirror sets that are using RAID 0 to stripe the data.