Which mobo, is epox EPoX 8K5A2+ good?

Sevenhunt

Member
Aug 23, 2002
104
0
0
Hi,

I`ve got my eye on the EPoX 8K5A2+,SockA,KT333,3xDDR,Audio,USB2,LAN,2RAID.
Is there anyone with experience with this mobo?
Speed, stability, compatibility?
Anything you know could be helpfull.
If you dont know anything, perhaps you`ve got another advise for me which mobo I should buy with the amd athlon xp 2200+ or 2100+.

Thx
Sevenhunt
 

Insane3D

Elite Member
May 24, 2000
19,446
0
0
Just set one up for a buddy of mine and it is a very nice board. It's basically the 8K3A+ with a new Southbridge (8235) and USB 2.0 and LAN. Excellent board at a great price. I might even get one for myself even though I don't really need one. :)


Here's a good review if you haven't already seen it.

8K5A2+ @ Tbreak

:)
 

Mem

Lifer
Apr 23, 2000
21,476
13
81
It`s a new KT333 board model by Epox but their boards in general are top notch in stability and also good choices for overclockers,so you`re on the right track choice wise.

Btw welcome to the AT (Anandtech) forums.


:)
 

VTrider

Golden Member
Nov 21, 1999
1,358
0
0
From what I've been reading about the EPoX 8K5A2+, it sure sounds like the real deal. I've been waiting forever for a KT333 board, well trying to figure out which one! Gigabyte (GA-7VRXP) was going to be my choice, but I just don't feel comfortable take a chance w/it now (even with a v2.0 model). I was looking at the MSI KT3 Ultra2 board, looks great, great reviews.

This Epox board seems to have everything I'm looking for: USB 2.0, LAN, RAID, Overclocking potential, ect. I really hope it pans out for this one.

-VTrider
 

veryape

Platinum Member
Jun 13, 2000
2,433
0
0
I understand your skeptisism towards the GA-7vrxp, but trust me, the rev. 2.0 boards are top notch and don't have any of the problems associated with the earlier revisions. Trust me, I own one, and I love it, and have not had a single problem with it and have no problems recommending it. I hate to see people not want to take the chance, although I can surely understand why they wouldn't, but all I can say is that I have had total stability with mine, which is overclocked to 1633MHz using an xp1800. Good Luck whatever your choice.
 

VTrider

Golden Member
Nov 21, 1999
1,358
0
0
Thanks, it's good to hear that. The GA-7VRXP is still an option for me. It's just that for a long while, it seemed that everybody w/ver. 2.0 had no problems - It seemed all those flaky things were fixed. Then if I remember correctly, was checking up on the reviews over at Newegg and I thought I read a whole bunch of people having problems again with their 2.0 revisions - it was just a bummer, then I lost hope.

-VTrider
 

Insane3D

Elite Member
May 24, 2000
19,446
0
0
VTrider -

First, their are a couple of differences to consider between the Epox and the Gigabyte. The specs are close between them, but their are some important differences you should know about. First, the Epox uses the newest Southbridge from Via, the 8235, while the Gigabyte uses the older 8233A. The main differences between the two are the 8235 has native USB 2.0 support, and it also has a upgraded V-Link connection between the Northbridge and Southbridge. The 8233A has a 266mb/s V-Link connection while the 8235 has a upgraded 533mb/s V-Link connection.

Both boards have USB 2.0, but how you get USB 2.0 is a little different on both boards. The Gigabyte uses a separate integrated Via controller that is essentially a PCI card on the motherboard. like the RAID controllers. Even though there is a separate chip on the motherboard, it still uses the PCI bus for communication. The newer 8235 Southbridge supports USB 2.0 natively, so there is no need for a separate controller chip. I'm also not positive on this, but I think the USB 2.0 of the 8235 is taken off the PCI bus and uses the V-Link connection. This is really not a huge deal, and I doubt you would notice too much "real world" performance difference between the two..but I think it's a important point.

Another important difference is the RAID controller. The Gigabyte uses the Promise "Lite" RAID controller chip, essentially a crippled Fasttrack TX2000 RAID controller. The Epox on the other hand, uses the Highpoint HP372 chip. The Highpoint, unlike the Promise, allows for fully configurable RAID setups...either 0, 1, or 0 + 1, and you can define your block sizes. The Promise chip only allows RAID 0 and 1, and does not allow you to specify the block size of the array.

Now, on to the onboard sound. The Gigabyte still uses the very dated Creative chip, essentially a PC128 card. It is only a 2 channel solution, but it can be made four channel I believe. The Epox on the other hand has the latest Realtek codec?s and is a full 6 channel solution. Neither sound options will replace a nice PCI soundcard, but if you need to use them, the Epox has nicer sound.

The last important difference between the two has to do with overclocking. The Gigabyte, like most other KT333 boards, only allows up to a 1.85v setting for the Vcore...and it's done in percentages..ie +7%, +10%. The Epox on the other hand lets you choose specific voltages, and has a large range from as low as 1.4V to as high as 2.2V! Many people do Vcore mods to their boards just to get around 2.0v...the Epox will go as high as 2.2v without any modding. While it really isn't a good idea to go above 1.9v, you have the option with the Epox if you need that last little bit of juice to stabilize your CPU.


Now, don?t misunderstand me, the Gigabyte and Epox are both great boards. I actually am running a o/ced GA-7VRXP (1.1) with no issues downstairs in one of my other systems. It's a great board, but if I was buying now, the Epox would be my choice hands down. :)
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,393
8,552
126
dangit insane you're gonna convince me to buy new hardware! :p
 

Insane3D

Elite Member
May 24, 2000
19,446
0
0
Originally posted by: ElFenix
dangit insane you're gonna convince me to buy new hardware! :p

/subliminal message to Elfenix

Buy it.....Buy it....BUY IT....

/end subliminal message to Elfenix

:p
 

VTrider

Golden Member
Nov 21, 1999
1,358
0
0
Wow, thanks Insane3D for the indepth tips. I was aware of a little of that, not so much in detail though. I've seen your advice often on these boards and regard your opinions very highly. I've been leaning toward the 8K5A2+ the more I learn about it. This is so crazy, I just have to make a decision quickly because it always seems that by the time I do so, there is something better/faster right around the corner. But i'm no stranger to that game, it's easy to get caught in that vicious 'always waiting' cycle.

Thanks again! :)

-VTrider
 

Insane3D

Elite Member
May 24, 2000
19,446
0
0
Well, if you can hold off for about a week, I just ordered one for myself to go with a 1600+ for some overclocking goodness! I will post my results..:)
 

VTrider

Golden Member
Nov 21, 1999
1,358
0
0
Oh that's great, that's exactly what I am going to be doing soon too! I'm running an XP 1600 on a K7S5A right now and have it running on a 147FSB (1540Mhz). I just know this little gem can do more, just needs that vcore adjustment, get that 1/5 divider kicking in and whamo!

-VTrider
 

serialb

Diamond Member
Mar 20, 2000
3,107
7
81
I was about to ask myself "How come I3D is not an elite yet?".... Well, I must have been living in a cave for a long ass time. :eek:

Good job explaining the difference between 2 great boards.