- Jun 24, 2001
- 24,195
- 857
- 126
I've changed my mind about overclocking this system so now I'm thinking about trying to reach at least 100FSB on my system for several reasons:
PCI/AGP clock divider can set the clock speed at 33PCI & 66AGP (As it should be)
Fully utilize the PC100 memory w/o overclocking it (No need to invite more instability)
I am *NOT* simply trying to achieve the highest clock! I would simply up the FSB to whatever the 466 could handle if that were true.
I have 2 matched 466Mhz PPGA Celeys (CPU Multi. 7x) in my dual CPU setup (Abit BP6 Dual Celeron Mobo)
I have 2 matched spare 366Mhz Celeys (CPU Multi. 5.5x) loose.
If I up the FSB on the 466's to 100Mhz, I force the processor to 700Mhz, which is WELL beyond the PPGA core's capabilities, right?
If I do the same on the 366's, I get 550Mhz Much more manageble/possible with a good cooler am I right?
So should I scrap the 466's for the 366's w/ excelent cooling? It just seems that they scale better to me.
I think I'll have better luck w/ the 366's because I've never heard of a 466 non-FC-PGA Celeron reaching 700 without something serious, so what do you guys think?
Sure, if I'm not overclocking anything, the Celeron 466's are what will stay in.
I'm planning on getting Retail Intel FC-PGA heatsinks (If they'll fit, the 933-1000Mhz HSFs are pretty big!).
PCI/AGP clock divider can set the clock speed at 33PCI & 66AGP (As it should be)
Fully utilize the PC100 memory w/o overclocking it (No need to invite more instability)
I am *NOT* simply trying to achieve the highest clock! I would simply up the FSB to whatever the 466 could handle if that were true.
I have 2 matched 466Mhz PPGA Celeys (CPU Multi. 7x) in my dual CPU setup (Abit BP6 Dual Celeron Mobo)
I have 2 matched spare 366Mhz Celeys (CPU Multi. 5.5x) loose.
If I up the FSB on the 466's to 100Mhz, I force the processor to 700Mhz, which is WELL beyond the PPGA core's capabilities, right?
If I do the same on the 366's, I get 550Mhz Much more manageble/possible with a good cooler am I right?
So should I scrap the 466's for the 366's w/ excelent cooling? It just seems that they scale better to me.
I think I'll have better luck w/ the 366's because I've never heard of a 466 non-FC-PGA Celeron reaching 700 without something serious, so what do you guys think?
Sure, if I'm not overclocking anything, the Celeron 466's are what will stay in.
I'm planning on getting Retail Intel FC-PGA heatsinks (If they'll fit, the 933-1000Mhz HSFs are pretty big!).
