• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Which low cost Intel processor should I buy?

chaosfire

Junior Member
I'm in the market for a socket-478 cpu, and the three that I've been looking at pretty closely were these:
Celeron D 330 - 2.66Ghz, 533FSB, Prescott, 20x multiplier, No HT
Pentium 4 2.4A - 533FSB, Prescott, 18x multiplier, No HT
Pentium 4 2.4C - 800FSB, Northwood, 12x multiplier, HT

I think the decision is pretty much down to the two P4s (unless somebody can point me to some benchmarks showing how the C-D 330 compares to the lower clocked P4), and I'm trying to determine which would be the better overclocker, the Northwood with the 12x multiplier and higher starting FSB (and HT), or the Prescott with an 18x multiplier and starting at a slower FSB. It seems like the Prescott would be the cheaper investment because I would only have to buy standard pc3200 RAM instead of 3500 or higher.

The system is going to be exclusively for gaming (and maybe 3D modeling if I find that Maya runs better on a Windows or Linux box then it does on my Mac) because I have another computer for my other tasks, so I don't think HT would be much of a benefit because most games aren't dual-processor aware (HT might not be of that much use even if I find that Maya runs better, I'd just render it on both my Macintosh and this machine).

Or is there another alternative that I'm not looking at that would be better?
 
Your mostly gaming??? Why are you looking at Celeron/P4's?

Get a Athlon64 system, or save some bucks and get a Sempron 3100+.
 
I already have a p4 board that was given to me, otherwise I would buy a A64 system (I am an AMD fanboy of sorts, but I can't pass up free gear)
 
2.4C - no contest. No real need for dual Processor awareness to get the benefits of HT. Multi-tasking is one of the areas where HT shines.
 
If you are planning on gaming, stay away from the Celeron.
I had a 2.4c Northwood and it overclocked without much effort to
3.0 on air cooling. Very good chip IMO.
I can't speak on the 2.4 Prescott, but I am thrilled with my 3.2E
reaching 3.8 on Air.
 
buy my 2.4A for $50 and i'll then get myself a 2.4C!! 🙂 anyhow, my point is, go for 2.4C, it has HT... 2.4A has SSE3 support... for me, i'd go for HT than SSE3...
 
Originally posted by: LTC8K6
2.4C - no contest. No real need for dual Processor awareness to get the benefits of HT. Multi-tasking is one of the areas where HT shines.

 
Back
Top