Which is worse terrorist or socialist?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

shira

Diamond Member
Jan 12, 2005
9,500
6
81
Is this a serious question? The opposite of socialism isn't terrorism, apples and oranges.

So, are you saying that the opposite of an apple isn't an orange? Or that socialism is like applies but terrorism is like something other than oranges? Or that comparing socialism to terrorism is like apples but another, better comparison would be oranges?
 

CallMeJoe

Diamond Member
Jul 30, 2004
6,938
5
81
They are both Facists. The elite few think they are smarter than the masses and they are trying to force the masses to do their will.
If you're going to call someone Fascist, you should at least learn to spell the word since you're not going to bother to learn what it means.
 

CallMeJoe

Diamond Member
Jul 30, 2004
6,938
5
81
The terrorists are compensating males trying to beat everyone down to escape the humiliation of their failing cultures (that degraded them at home and in the madrassas)
The socialists and liberals etc are comprised of feminized men - and the angry, willful women that create them (think the Clintons).
Both the terrorists and libs are emotional thinkers who are subsequently irrational. The more emotional and irrational they become the more they view the center and normality with hostility.
Feminized, liberal homosexuals will hate Christianity as much as the Terrorists do despite fact the terrorists want to throw them off buildings (the proscribed method).
Like a woman with battered woman's syndrome, libs embrace bullies and dictators etc. People without character who give in to bullies usually dont see their capitulations as cowardice but as a higher form of love and understanding. Their real rage they save for safe targets - often the people actually standing up to the bully (who libs see as the real problem and not the bully).
Libs are programmed to self destruct on a personal level and collectively they pull a nation down by always excusing wrong and attacking anyone not as dysfunctional as them (they see these people as evil because they feel persecuted by them inwardly - they remind them of what they have lost - they especially hate innocence which is why they can't do kids in fast enough).
Terrorists also do themselves and their societies in - all the time feeling holy (like libs).
Both extremes have big egos that call for an exaggerated sense of self and desire for recognition (like lib celebs). They are two horns on the same goat. Just think of libs and terrorists as abnormal and filling out the two extremes of failure on each side of the center.
As our feminized society becomes more perverse, cowardly and dysfunctional (which feeeeels like progress to libs) the male compensating terrorists become more emboldened. We are watching this now as Muslim groups set out Islamicize the US with libs help.
Libs are like the nutty scientist from the 1950's movies who always see the monster trying to destroy people as a beautiful creation that needs to be preserved. They did this with the USSR before the Muslim terrorists

I don't think I've ever read such an irredeemable load of pseudo-intellectual psychobabble. Do your rants about "feminized liberal males" make you feel better about your own sexual inadequacies?
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
Unlike socialists, terrorists don't kid themselves into thinking their actions are going to improve the lives of those they target :)

But in real life, most socialists are simply folks who think the have a good idea, and aren't working to forment violent proletariat takeover of the means of production. Not all ideologues (whether socialist, neo-conservative, religious zealot, anarchist, or anything else) are reactionaries who think they have revealed truth of how the rest of us should both live and try to impose it upon us. Many (if not the overwhelming majority) of people with socialistic beliefs are peacefully working to spread their beliefs by persuasion of their argument or at the ballot box, rather than by killing all the bourgeoisie.
 

CallMeJoe

Diamond Member
Jul 30, 2004
6,938
5
81
I'm having a hard time figuring this one out, anyone got any ideas?
Both are hellbent on destroying free societies, both ruin people's lives, and both dogmatically believe they're doing the right thing.
ATOT want to give some input?
I just caught the "Which is worse" threads in OT you're so badly parodying.
Massive fail. You deserved the move to P&N.
 

manimal

Lifer
Mar 30, 2007
13,559
8
0
Well I have a solution. If some people think the US is sooo bad and socialist why dont they go to a truly libertarian country that lets corporations and individuals do what they want. There are no taxes, you can exclude anyone you want from your establishment and land is free for the taking.

Where is this you ask?

Somalia....
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
Never said it was true - I said it's becoming more and more like it's true. Their agendas are seeminly merging although tactics are diverse.

Don't see how the agendas are similar. Once wants to expand egalitarianism. Islam (main source of terror these days) wants to propagate their extreme religion which includes keeping women down.
 

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,948
126
I don't think I've ever read such an irredeemable load of pseudo-intellectual psychobabble. Do your rants about "feminized liberal males" make you feel better about your own sexual inadequacies?

Dude is insane for sure
 

classy

Lifer
Oct 12, 1999
15,219
1
81
Where do all these stupid motherfrackers come from? Here are pics of what terrorists do

9/11 Terrorist Attack
_47275775_008709685-1.jpg


Aftermath of a suicide bomber
baghdad_bodies_suicide_bombing.jpe


Oklahoma City Bombing
oklahoma_439_city_bombing.jpg


4489d1538cc3b_s.jpg



Maybe you think you are funny with the little rightwing nutt job politcal comparison. Terrorists are ruthless and heinous individuals. And only a dumb and ignorant fvck even in humour would make such a stupid analogy.
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
Both are hellbent on destroying free societies, both ruin people's lives, and both dogmatically believe they're doing the right thing.

Funny, that description also sounds an awful lot like the religious zealots that make up the Republican base.
 
Oct 30, 2004
11,442
32
91
I'm having a hard time figuring this one out, anyone got any ideas?

Both are hellbent on destroying free societies, both ruin people's lives, and both dogmatically believe they're doing the right thing.

It's gotta be those evil excrement grubbing socialists!

Imagine! These despicable people want to reduce the percentage of the nation's GDP (17%) spent on health care and implement real socialized medicine which has been shown to be less expensive and more efficient and superior in every first world nation that has implemented it while providing coverage for 100% of the population. They would also end up eliminating the hundreds of thousands of medical bankrupticies that are filed every year, putting bankruptcy attorneys and judges out of work. On top of that, insurance plan brokers and company benefits plan managers could also end up out of work since businesses would no longer be burdened with insurance concerns. What kinds of evil people would put health insurance executives out on the street without a job? How could they survive if they could no longer purchase yachts with their multi-million dollar salaries that come off the backs of the sick? Oh the humanity!

In other industries the socialists want to tax rich bankers and executives who are paid 500x times what lowly workers are paid, making it harder for them to afford 5 vacation homes and yachts.

Yup. The socialists are evil incarnate.
 
Last edited:

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
Given your right-wing mindset, obviously the socialists are far worse. The terrorists have given your right-wing gods license to wage war on the world...increasing the wealth of the ultra-right wingers and increasing the right-wing's love for police states. (patriot act)


Thank you... truth .. sad that so few American voters or taxpayers are smart enough to see it.
 
Oct 30, 2004
11,442
32
91
Can we find a photo of homeless people as an example of capitalism? How about a photo of people dying from treatable medical ailments?
 

HamburgerBoy

Lifer
Apr 12, 2004
27,111
318
126
What about capitalism? Particularly the right-wing one!

I don't know what the Iraq War or the Israeli-Palestinian conflict have to do with capitalism, but they're still a footnote compared to what I posted.

Can we find a photo of homeless people as an example of capitalism? How about a photo of people dying from treatable medical ailments?

Coaltub.png

Sweatshop-1890.jpg

Riischildren.jpg


:hmm:

Sorry, socialism is still worse.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Hacp

Lifer
Jun 8, 2005
13,923
2
81
while providing coverage for 100% of the population.

No! Lazy people don't deserve health insurance. They were probably partying in high school the night before the final exam while all the productive people were cramming. Then, they make a bunch of babies and eat burgers till they get diabetes so they can qualify for welfare, food stamps,medicaid, Section 7, disability, and free cable. Those people deserve whatever they have coming.
 

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
Socialism cannot be worse if you have the freedom to vote or leave.. Call home and talk to Mom.
 

Acanthus

Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
19,915
2
76
ostif.org
I love the ADHD thoughts of some of the people in this thread.

"The socialists put a price floor on the earnings of an individual so they don't starve to death, clearly they are trying to exterminate enemy races in the most diverse country on earth."

"Protectionist trade laws are draconian efforts to make sure we all get poor."

Christ where do you morons get this stuff?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.