Which is worse terrorist or socialist?

[TehMac]

I'm having a hard time figuring this one out, anyone got any ideas?

Both are hellbent on destroying free societies, both ruin people's lives, and both dogmatically believe they're doing the right thing.

ATOT want to give some input?


Thread locked due to it being turned into a pissing match by JohnOfSheffiled and a couple others.

Red Dawn
Anandtech Admin

 

[edro]

yay nazis

 

[BoomerD]

I'm having a hard time figuring this one out, anyone got any ideas?

Both are hellbent on destroying free societies, both ruin people's lives, and both dogmatically believe they're doing the right thing.

ATOT want to give some input?

Given your right-wing mindset, obviously the socialists are far worse. The terrorists have given your right-wing gods license to wage war on the world...increasing the wealth of the ultra-right wingers and increasing the right-wing's love for police states. (patriot act)

 

[TehMac]

yay nazis

Good point, Nazis are socialists too.

Given your right-wing mindset, obviously the socialists are far worse. The terrorists have given your right-wing gods license to wage war on the world...increasing the wealth of the ultra-right wingers and increasing the right-wing's love for police states. (patriot act)

I love a police state? That's news to me. Last I checked, many right wing folks believed in Legalizing drugs and were highly critical of many sections of the Patriot Act.

 

[SMOGZINN]

I'm having a hard time figuring this one out, anyone got any ideas?

Both are hellbent on destroying free societies, both ruin people's lives, and both dogmatically believe they're doing the right thing.

ATOT want to give some input?

What should really scare you is that there are socialist terrorists groups.

 

[amdhunter]

 

[daw123]

One is definitely detrimental to society, whereas the other isn't so much.

Guess which one is which?

Terrorist - Goes out of his, her or their organisations way to blow things up, kill people, cause casualties and basically elevate public insecurity and hysteria as a result of the perceived or actual threat of terror

Socialism - Socialists want everything government controlled for the people and outside of the control of fat cat corporations. Doesn't take into account that governments generally don't serve the 'people' and they are inefficient, wasteful and self-supporting.

The lists are not exhaustive, but a brief summary of my thoughts, since that is all I could think of on the spur of the moment. Give me some more time and I can add to both lists.

 

[Firsttime]

Is this a serious question? The opposite of socialism isn't terrorism, apples and oranges.

 

[bfdd]

this can't be a serious post.

 

[Craig234]

No thread should ever again be locked as a troll if this piece of crap isn't locked as one.

Idiot spews his mindless ideology.

 

[Acanthus]

Who let him back in?

Weren't you banned for this kind of shit before?

 

[Lemon law]

TehMac has the gal to ask, "Which is worse terrorist or socialist?"

Sadly we might ask, what is worst, the conservatism of TehMac, terrorism, or socialism?

The latter two are ways to address past problems, the former is a futile attempt to pretend the world will not keep changing.

 

[daw123]

Oh shit, this has been moved to P&N.

Quickly backs out of thread.

Please have mercy on my innocent-ish soul.

 

[Steeplerot]

Yet the reality of evil Socialists and Socialist countries with advanced mixed market economies are freer and have higher standards of living for their people.
Yet they are out to destroy free society!11!!!!
Idiot.

 

[umbrella39]

I'm having a hard time figuring this one out, anyone got any ideas?

Both are hellbent on destroying free societies, both ruin people's lives, and both dogmatically believe they're doing the right thing.

ATOT want to give some input?

Neocon crybaby stay at home kids are the worst. The forum is full of them and their sock puppets.

 

[Infohawk]

Good point, Nazis are socialists too.

Primary education really isn't doing it's job is it? People don't even understand that you shouldn't judge a book by its cover. Read the article on national socialism. It will help your brain.

 

[MovingTarget]

Failpoll.

 

[TehMac]

TehMac has the gal to ask, "Which is worse terrorist or socialist?"

Sadly we might ask, what is worst, the conservatism of TehMac, terrorism, or socialism?

The latter two are ways to address past problems, the former is a futile attempt to pretend the world will not keep changing.

this might make your mind explode, but I'm not a conservative. And LOL at this thread being moved to P&N. There is a mod with a sense of humor.

 

[piasabird]

They are both Facists. The elite few think they are smarter than the masses and they are trying to force the masses to do their will.

 

[Danube]

The terrorists are compensating males trying to beat everyone down to escape the humiliation of their failing cultures (that degraded them at home and in the madrassas)

The socialists and liberals etc are comprised of feminized men - and the angry, willful women that create them (think the Clintons).

Both the terrorists and libs are emotional thinkers who are subsequently irrational. The more emotional and irrational they become the more they view the center and normality with hostility.

Feminized, liberal homosexuals will hate Christianity as much as the Terrorists do despite fact the terrorists want to throw them off buildings (the proscribed method).

Like a woman with battered woman's syndrome, libs embrace bullies and dictators etc. People without character who give in to bullies usually dont see their capitulations as cowardice but as a higher form of love and understanding. Their real rage they save for safe targets - often the people actually standing up to the bully (who libs see as the real problem and not the bully).

Libs are programmed to self destruct on a personal level and collectively they pull a nation down by always excusing wrong and attacking anyone not as dysfunctional as them (they see these people as evil because they feel persecuted by them inwardly - they remind them of what they have lost - they especially hate innocence which is why they can't do kids in fast enough).

Terrorists also do themselves and their societies in - all the time feeling holy (like libs).

Both extremes have big egos that call for an exaggerated sense of self and desire for recognition (like lib celebs). They are two horns on the same goat. Just think of libs and terrorists as abnormal and filling out the two extremes of failure on each side of the center.

As our feminized society becomes more perverse, cowardly and dysfunctional (which feeeeels like progress to libs) the male compensating terrorists become more emboldened. We are watching this now as Muslim groups set out Islamicize the US with libs help.

Libs are like the nutty scientist from the 1950's movies who always see the monster trying to destroy people as a beautiful creation that needs to be preserved. They did this with the USSR before the Muslim terrorists

 

[Harvey]

I'm having a hard time figuring this one out, anyone got any ideas?

If you're really having such a hard time with that ridiculous question, you may be too stupid to understand that they're not related in any way. The fact that you even asked the question doesn't speak well for you. :hmm:

 

[Hayabusa Rider]

If you're really having such a hard time with that ridiculous question, you may be too stupid to understand that they're not related in any way. The fact that you even asked the question doesn't speak well for you. :hmm:

So Harvey- when you were in school did you walk or carry your lunch?

 

[Hacp]

One terrorist is about as bad as 1000 socialists. However, there are a LOT of socialists.

 

[Harvey]

So Harvey- when you were in school did you walk or carry your lunch?

Yes... or maybe not. It all depends.

 

[HamburgerBoy]

They're the same thing.