<< I thought 133@cas3 would be faster? Does anyone have any hard proof of which is faster? >>
You are right. The difference is small but measurable. Using SANDRA 2000 memory benchmark:
100fsb/cas2: 279/345
133fsb/cas3: 318/410
You need a VIA Apollo 133A type motherboard to run memory at 133 FSB when the CPU uses 100 FSB. It makes the VIA a better solution to overclock a Celeron2 than the BX based MB.
Windows 2000 Professional
Celeron2 533 @ 800, 1.75V, Golden Orb
P3V4X (BIOS 1006 Beta 1), 100 FSB @ 3/4 CPU/memory bus
256MB Infineon, PC133, 2-2-2, 7.5 ns (running PC100/2-2-2 or PC133/3-2-2)
Adaptec 26160 SCSI adapter (BIOS 257.2),
WD Enterprice 10K 18.3MB LVD/Ultar160
Plextor 412 CDR
Plextor 32x caddy CD drive
HP1533A DDS2 4mm tape
Iomega Insider SCSI zip drive.
Tekram DC-315U SCSI Ultra2 card, (no BIOS, for external SCSI only)
Microtek 600V scanner
Toshiba 3401 external CDROM drive
Matrox G400
Linksys Etherfast 10/100 WOL LAN card
Eqsonics AudioPCI
3Com Robotics V.90 hardware modem (PCI).