it is said that there is a rule that all intuitives are smarter than all sensing types. but i dont think that is true because Js are very close minded and STPs actually cover more bases as well as make less error (for example, STP Theodore Roosevelt's writings are much more eloquent and have fewer things that needed to be corrected or which turned out to be wrong vs. STJ Wilson's writings; ESTP Andrew Jackson was also a more eloquent writer than NTJ Grant was).
and all perceiving types are more independent than all J types, because J types rely on someone already existing to have feelings for or to think about. and then SPs michael jackson and trent reznor, for two examples, have actually made real contributions to the world unlike NJs John Adams, Ben Bernanke, John Quincy Adams, or Alexander Hamilton have... the only achievements of the latter five actually were really only self-serving ("hey, look at me, i was the first treasury secretary"), very short term (like QE from Ben Bernanke and jq adams' attempts to weaken the institution of slavery while actually winding up freeing one person who would enslave several more), something the vast majority of society was opposed to (hamilton and the Constitution), and/or basically recycling of waste. and ESPs are usually good company, certainly more fun to be around with than Js like me (more people would rather be stranded on an island with bill clinton while no one would want to be stranded on an island with me).
then there is no comparison between an NJ and an NP as the NP is smarter every time (e.g., an INTJ friend of mine wanted to become a programmer but he was more focused on the prestige of getting a Ph. D while INTP John Carmack never wanted to go to college... the latter could teach himself, which means he had higher fluid intelligence, while the former simply had to go by what was already established in order to accomplish anything). finally, INTPs and INFPs know how to live in their own world, while ENTPs and ENFPs just know how to find help and they usually can but Js are reliant on established structure.
and the problem that we are facing is the fact that Ps make up about 3/7 of the population, yet they are forced to go to structured school when it hurts them. compulsory education cant help anyone advance the world because the Js cant make anything new and because all mentally retarded people are Js.
so given all that, can we conclude that the Ps are the producers and that the Js are advanced by centralization and concentration of power? dont you believe that the average IQ of all SPs is higher than that of all J types?
anyway, i am sorry for another MBTI thread, but i wanted input from people at AT on this topic.
and all perceiving types are more independent than all J types, because J types rely on someone already existing to have feelings for or to think about. and then SPs michael jackson and trent reznor, for two examples, have actually made real contributions to the world unlike NJs John Adams, Ben Bernanke, John Quincy Adams, or Alexander Hamilton have... the only achievements of the latter five actually were really only self-serving ("hey, look at me, i was the first treasury secretary"), very short term (like QE from Ben Bernanke and jq adams' attempts to weaken the institution of slavery while actually winding up freeing one person who would enslave several more), something the vast majority of society was opposed to (hamilton and the Constitution), and/or basically recycling of waste. and ESPs are usually good company, certainly more fun to be around with than Js like me (more people would rather be stranded on an island with bill clinton while no one would want to be stranded on an island with me).
then there is no comparison between an NJ and an NP as the NP is smarter every time (e.g., an INTJ friend of mine wanted to become a programmer but he was more focused on the prestige of getting a Ph. D while INTP John Carmack never wanted to go to college... the latter could teach himself, which means he had higher fluid intelligence, while the former simply had to go by what was already established in order to accomplish anything). finally, INTPs and INFPs know how to live in their own world, while ENTPs and ENFPs just know how to find help and they usually can but Js are reliant on established structure.
and the problem that we are facing is the fact that Ps make up about 3/7 of the population, yet they are forced to go to structured school when it hurts them. compulsory education cant help anyone advance the world because the Js cant make anything new and because all mentally retarded people are Js.
so given all that, can we conclude that the Ps are the producers and that the Js are advanced by centralization and concentration of power? dont you believe that the average IQ of all SPs is higher than that of all J types?
anyway, i am sorry for another MBTI thread, but i wanted input from people at AT on this topic.
Facebook
Twitter