Which is faster?

Furen

Golden Member
Oct 21, 2004
1,567
0
0
Since the 2T command rate will give you a bandwidth hit to begin with, I'd say you'd be better off at 2.6GHz @ 216MHz.
 

Matt2

Diamond Member
Jul 28, 2001
4,762
0
0
Shouldnt there be another divider in there somewhere? I'm running my A64 @ 2.7GHZ and RAM at 200mhz.

As for your question, I would definately say that you should run 2.6/216. OCing the RAM above 200mhz is going to be pretty useless unless you have tight timings as well, but if you go under 200mhz then your sysytem is gonna be starved off bandwidth.

My $0.02
 

The Green Bean

Diamond Member
Jul 27, 2003
6,506
7
81
I have an epox and it doesnt have too many divider options. I can run it at 100, 133, 166, 200 : FSB only
 

mindwreck

Golden Member
May 25, 2003
1,585
1
81
Run some benchmarks.
I remember my sempron taking a hit when i had to increase the memory divider to lower mem clock and get a higher cpu overclock. Forgot where but i think it was around 2.3 or 2.4.

My memory was running under 200mhz and my prime95 benchmark times actually increased instead of decreasing from the extra cpu overclock.
 

Tweakin

Platinum Member
Feb 7, 2000
2,532
0
71
Since we are only talking about 100 Mhz for the cpu clock, I would go with the higher mem as long as the latencies were the same.